Washington State Kills Last of Wolf Pack Hours Before Court-Ordered Reprieve

Written by on August 23, 2019 in Environment, Wildlife with 0 Comments
image_pdfimage_print

By Olivia Rosane | EcoWatch

The last four members of an embattled wolf pack were killed in Washington State Friday, hours before the court order that could have saved them.

The wolves, members of the Old Profanity Territory pack in the Colville National Forest of Northeastern Washington, were killed by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) after the pack killed or injured 14 cattle in a ten-month period, KUOW reported.

The killings occurred early Friday morning before a court hearing began at 9:30 a.m. in King County Superior Court. The judge ordered the state to temporarily halt its wolf killings until the case could go to trial, but the order came too late.

“It's unbelievably tragic that this wolf family has already been annihilated by the state,” Sophia Ressler of wildlife advocacy group the Center for Biological Diversity told the Associated Press. “It seems like Washington's wildlife agency is bent on wiping out the state's wolves.”

Washington State's wolf management plan allows for the “lethal removal” of wolves that attack livestock in the eastern part of the state, where they are not federally listed as an endangered species, according to KUOW. Before the agency resorts to wolf killings, however, any rancher whose livestock is threatened must first show that they took reasonable measures to protect their animals. These include hiring a type of cowboy known as a range rider, using lights and noise to scare wolves and removing sick and injured animals. The WDFW claimed reasonable steps were taken in the case of the Old Profanity Territory pack, but the Center for a Humane Economy, the group that supported the suit to stop the killings, disagreed. They argued that the rancher in question had asked state range riders to leave his ranch July 8. Nine of the 14 recent livestock attacks occurred after this date.

The group also questioned WDFW's decision to schedule the killings for the morning before a hearing.

“It's like, ‘Okay, we've got to get these wolves now, in case the judge stops us,'” Center for a Humane Economy President Wayne Pacelle told KUOW.

WDFW spokesperson Staci Lehman said the scheduling of the killings was just “unfortunate timing.”

“It's always unfortunate whenever we have to remove wolves,” Lehman told KUOW. “It's never taken lightly by anybody at the department.”

WDFW Director Kelly Susewind authorized the lethal removal of the pack on July 31 after finding it responsible for 29 total livestock attacks since Sept. 2018, according to an agency statement. Since Aug. 1, WDFW has killed seven wolves on the following dates:

  • Aug. 7: one wolf
  • Aug. 8: one wolf
  • Aug.13: one wolf
  • Aug.16: four wolves

The wolves killed included four pups, the Center for a Humane Economy said in a statement. The agency said it had killed all known members of the pack, though another wolf was sited in the area in the spring. WDFW said it might be a member of another pack, while KUOW and the center reported it as a surviving member of the Old Profanity Territory pack.

The ranch that originated the complaints that led to the killings is the Diamond M Ranch owned by the McIrvin family, the center said. Complaints from this family have prompted 87 percent of the wolf killings in Washington.

READ THE REST OF THIS ARTICLE…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top
Send this to a friend