1

Here’s What the mRNA Jab Does To the Body | Dr. Christina Parks, PhD in Cellular and Molecular Biology

|

VIDEO SOURCE: America’s Frontline Doctors | White Coat Summit website.

Dr. Christina Parks, who has a PhD in Cellular and Molecular Biology, talks about the dangers of mRNA technology used for the COVID-19 jab, including damaging the immune system. (SEE THE TRANSCRIPT BELOW) She was one of approximately 20 speakers at the “White Coat Summit” hosted by America’s Frontline Doctors on July, 27 2023. To watch the videos of the rest of the brilliant and brave speakers, including Dr. Robert Malone whose talk Dr. Parks mentions, visit the White Coat Summit website.

Note that Dr. Parks previously testified in the state of Michigan in support of HB4471, a bill that banned employers from requiring the COVID-19 vaccines in the workplace. You can watch her expert testimony HERE.

TRANSCRIPT

Thank you. Well, I think Dr. Malone did an excellent job of setting me up. Basically, the concern is that they are really looking to push this technology [genetic vaccines like the COVID-19 jab]. They are set to try to make a fortune off of it, and to that end, they neither are concerned that it’s not safe or effective, and they want to shut down all information that might suggest so.

What I’m going to do today is focus on the science, and you may hear me repeat some of the things that Dr. Malone has already said, but I think that it’s complex enough that that’s not going to hurt anybody. So, if I can have the first slide, I want to really talk about the dangers of this technology.

I’m supposed to be clicking it? OK, alright. Perfect.

So, how is this different from a traditional vaccine? In a traditional vaccine, a small amount of the viral protein or antigen, or sometimes only just a portion of it, is injected. It’s never inside the cell; it’s in the fluid between your cells. Sometimes, it gets into the bloodstream. Your immune system recognizes and makes antibodies. I’m going into the whole process beyond that.

Gene therapy is very different because, as Dr. Malone said, it turns your body into a manufacturing plant for the antigen. And in this case, it’s the full-length spike protein, which is toxic and is the cause of the deleterious effects of COVID. So, why would we want to turn our bodies into a manufacturing plant for a toxic foreign viral protein? It makes no sense.

So, when I learned that they were going to use these gene therapy vaccines, I was extremely concerned. I, like Dr. Malone, understood that this was a cell-free system that they’d bring to market very quickly, but I thought the potential harm had not been worked out and were substantial. And the ethical concerns of… they can basically make your body make anything that they want it to make.

And so, you’re even trusting them that the genetic information that they’re giving you is what they say they’re giving you. And even if it’s what they intended, there could be a defect in manufacturing, and you could either get a mutation in that gene or you could get something altogether different through some sort of recombinatory event.

Concerns With Gene Transfer Technology Being Used for Vaccines

So the concerns with gene therapy technology. First, here are the goals of gene therapy:

  • To get the target genetic material into as many cells of interest as possible. This is not necessary for a vaccination scenario. You only need a little bit.
  • In gene therapy, you want the mRNA for the gene to be expressed as long as possible.

The reason I’m telling you this is because all of the technology is geared toward these ends: toward getting it into as many cells and getting it expressed as long as possible. And that’s why they use that pseudouridine instead of regular mRNA, which is degraded much quicker, and to have as much of the target protein made as possible.

Now, if you were replacing a defective gene, those would be seen as good things. However, when you’re talking about making a toxic, viral, foreign protein that causes all of these problems, that’s a problem. Alright, so I’ll just read here.

The most important thing to consider when using gene therapy as a vaccine is that the cells are being instructed to make a foreign viral protein rather than a human protein. Thus, it should be expected that the immune system will target this foreign protein and the cells of your body that are producing it for destruction.

Alright, I want to back up just a step, because I’m going to go on that point more.
But the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), Dr. Malone talked about this, that was my first thought when they said they were using gene therapy. There are two platforms: the adenoviral vector and the nanoparticles. Both are highly inflammatory. I believe with the adenoviral vector, a young man actually died.

Concerns with the Lipid Nanoparticles in mRNA Vaccines

Now some of these technologies are being used where they take cells out of the body, do some gene therapy on them, and put them back in. That’s very different. And because these, once they’re in the body, are highly inflammatory.

The other thing I want to say is there’s some technology being used for something like cancer. It’s very different to take someone who has no quality of life because of a genetic defect, or has cancer, or is very elderly, and using a very controversial technology in them. But when you’re talking about using this in healthy individuals, the cost-benefit, there is almost all cost and no benefit.

And these nanoparticles are extremely inflammatory. Pfizer’s own distribution data show they’re fat-like particles, and they’re synthetic. So they dysregulate the lipid or fat signaling in the body and they accumulate in the fatty areas of your body. That’s your ovaries.

So, we’re sending material that’s going to make a toxic viral protein that’s highly inflammatory to your children’s ovaries. It gets in the bone marrow, where you can get insertional mutagenesis. It gets in your adrenal glands, which modulate your whole hormonal axis.

And so, if you’re freaking out because your adrenal glands are screwed up because they’ve got this material in them. And of course, the heart itself is surrounded by fat and we’re seeing myocarditis many times within days or hours after injection.

They can disrupt the blood-brain barrier integrity. They can mimic our body’s own natural lipids, specifically phosphatidylserine, causing the cells to fuse. If these mimic that, your heart cells and other cells might try to fuse instead of doing whatever they’re supposed to be doing. Alright?

And so, your cell membrane – think of the old switchboard. It’s like the world’s largest, most complicated switchboard in terms of cellular signaling. You’re taking a bunch of synthetic, man-made lipids and integrating those into the cell membrane. Should we be surprised when the body’s signaling is completely screwed up and disrupted?

And then Dr. Malone also talked about the problems with the synthetic mRNA.

Concerns with Synthetic mRNA

This is man-made. It’s made to be more efficient at making the protein than your normal mRNA. It doesn’t get broken down. We don’t know how long it continues to make this viral protein, but at this point, it looks like in some cases it could be indefinitely.

And then, your body reacts to this mRNA and it’s also going to react to these nano-lipid particles. In order to tamp down that immune response that has been so problematic throughout the lifetime of this technology, what they did is they engineered it to kind of turn off some of your toll-like receptors, to turn them down, to dysregulate them so that they wouldn’t have a hyper-inflamatory response.

Well, they’re not just turning them down to this technology; they’re turning them down to everything. So the technology itself becomes immunosuppressive, meaning it screws up your immune system in a way where you are not going to respond properly to a pathogen or an immune challenge.

Understanding the J&J and Astrazeneca Vaccines

The J&J, I just want to mention these briefly. I’m not going through all of this in the interest of time. Dr. Malone is an expert on this, and I don’t claim to be.

But my understanding is that this DNA technology is kind of a cassette system where they can put in multiple genes and multiple regulatory elements. So they could say you could use multiple vaccinations and multiple antigens, and they can regulate them all differently. What does that look like ethically?

Maybe they’re putting in this, that you know they’re putting in, maybe putting something else that’s regulated and then when you eat cheese it’s turned on, and now you’re expressing a protein you didn’t even know was in you.

Ethically, I have a huge problem with them putting in genetic information that they can then regulate through hormonal or other means – things they spray in the air, things they put in the food supply. Very problematic for me. OK, I’m gonna move on from that.

Now this gets to my central point that this technology turns your cells into manufacturing plants for whatever they decide to put in there. In this case, the spike protein.

Spike Protein Production in Lymph Cells

And so here we see cells, I believe these are from lymph tissue, making mRNA, and it was made out all the way until 60 days when they ended the experiment. And then right behind that, we see protein production. So at least 60 days. And some people have said that they have seen spike protein being produced in the non-classical monocytes up to six months, possibly up to two years in some of the vaccine injured.

Now, this is going to be extremely variable depending on what you got, how this is working in your cells. There are so many complex variations, and that’s the point, isn’t it? Nobody sort of standardized this process. Some people’s body may be degraded or maybe it was degraded before it got infected to you, we don’t really know.

And this is Dr. Ryan Cole’s work where he stained for the spike protein, and what he saw, what you’re seeing here, and these are many different tissues including heart tissue, brain tissue, and the coronary artery, is that these small focal points are where the cells are producing the spike protein.

So if you are producing a foreign protein, what is your body going to do? It’s going to send immune cells to destroy those cells that are making the spike protein. And that is exactly what we are seeing.

We are seeing immune infiltration. And when those immune cells infiltrate anything, what happens when you get some sort of infection? It swells. So you get swelling, you get immune infiltration, you get inflammation.

And beyond that, what happens is your immune cells, in eating the spike protein, start to eat through your very tissues.

Myocarditis After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination

And so here’s what we’re seeing, in this case, these brown spots are the immune cells. And you can see in this bottom right one, it’s focal. So when the cells are producing the spike protein, that’s where you see it. It’s not every single cell, but where you see it, that’s what you see.

These cells can basically eat through your tissues. And so in the case of, we’re seeing aortic dissections, if you have your blood vessels producing the spike protein and you’re destroying infected cells, you end up with a perforation in that tissue or a weak spot in that tissue, especially when talking about an artery that is under a considerable amount of stress.

Now again, if this is in your ovaries, you’re getting immune infiltration and inflammation in your ovaries.

Alright, so I want to talk about Kevin McKernan’s work where he identified that there is plasmid contamination or adulteration.

Genetic Material in mRNA Vaccines

The very first clinical trials were done with synthetic mRNA produced in a lab. But then when they ramped up, they’re like we need a lot more template. What was the template? It’s something called a plasmid, something that is the backbone of DNA recombinant technology because it’s used to kind of cut and paste in a puzzle-like way whatever you want to put together.

So they put the spike protein in this plasmid, they grew up in a lot of bacteria, they theoretically purified it, and then they used it to make the mRNA. And they were supposed to purify the mRNA, and then put it in the nano-lipid particles, and then put in your body.

Either they didn’t, or they didn’t try very hard because there’s a ton of this plasmid DNA. Since they didn’t clean it out, there’s likely a lot of bacterial cell membrane as well.

If you’re a doctor, you know the bacterial cell membrane is highly, highly inflammatory. In terms of vaccinology, it’s one of the top causes of anaphylaxis and inflammation, leading to a kind of anaphylactic shock-like condition that causes people to die right after vaccination if it’s contaminated. And so that may be some of the anaphylaxis that we’ve seen. However, this DNA basically can get back into bacteria.

So, I want to show you when he sequenced it, this is a plasmid (there’s no controversy about this):

Pfizer’s Plasmid

This is what Pfizer used. And what it has in it, it has a promoter region from a monkey virus, simian virus 40 promoter region, that actually localizes it to the nucleus of mamalian cells. So, this contaminating DNA is now going to be localized. Maybe it gets in your gut, because all bacteria are going to take it up when they see this. Bacteria are going to take it up, they’re going to divide, they’re going to spread. You’re going to spread it to your unvaccinated neighbors, friends, relatives.

So this is an unintentional potential infectious agent that codes for the spike protein that could infect your nasopharynx and your gut and target the spike protein to the nucleus of your cells.

Is this being done? We don’t know, but did anybody test for it? And we know that this can happen because there was a lab working with a plasmid that had the capsid protein in it, and they kept testing positive for COVID. They found out that their bacteria had taken up the plasmid.

So, many of the vaccinated have gotten a lot of this plasmid, some of it whole, some of it broken, some of it being able to target into their nucleus. So this is an adulteration and contamination that should not be in there, and it’s a very intrinsic problem to this kind of technology that has not been addressed.

Beyond this, these plasmids are what are used to pop genes in and out of things. So when you have this in your gut, and you have another kind of infection or it’s in your (???) – wherever it is, on your skin, you can get recombination. That’s what genetic material does; it recombines.

If there’s another kind of viral infection, this can actually be packaged into bacterial viruses called bacteriophages, or it can recombine and become part of another virus. Could part of the spike protein now become part of another cold virus? So now we’ve got some active spike protein in the cold is going around.

Nobody has addressed these in the rush to just, you know, it looks like good technology. You know, basically, we’re playing God. We are playing God, and the only reason why we get away with it is the grace of God.

Likely Consequences of Plasmid Contamination of Pfizer Vaccine

Alright, so likely consequences of plasmid contamination of the Pfizer vaccine:

  • Contaminating bacterial endotoxins, if they didn’t purify it enough, may cause anaphylaxis, severe inflammation, and other vaccine injuries.
  • This pseudoridine and this plasma DNA can hybridize and make these weird DNA-RNA hybrids that are going to screw up your immune system and cause all sorts of dysregulated immune system functioning.
  • You know, as an aside, women go into labor because enough of the fetal DNA has gotten into their circulation, and it binds to these different receptors and signals the body to go into labor. So we have receptors to identify the genetic material in our body, whether it’s our own, our child, or bacterial or fungal. So our body’s responsive to this. To think that we can inject all this crap into our bodies without consequence is extremely arrogant. Right?
  • And again, they found that the plasmids are being encased in these lipid particles, and so they’re going all over into our bodies. And again, they can be targeted to the nucleus of different cells, and they can be incorporated into little bacteriophage particles. So the question becomes, have we created a synthetic infectious agent that’s going to infect the vaccinated and the unvaccinated alike?

Chronic Immune Activation

So again, I wanted to focus on the dangers inherent to the technology. But I want to talk about an overall paradigm for injury that we are seeing. Because the spike protein is so injurious and it’s so highly inflammatory.

The spike protein was used because it causes immune activation. Now, your body’s making it chronically, so you have chronic immune activation. When you have that, your T-cells, your T-cells have two jobs:

  • find infected cells like those infected by viruses or pathogens and destroy them
  • find cancer cells and destroy them.

When your body’s under a state of chronic immune activation, it’s like, “hey, we can’t keep destroying ourselves, we can’t keep hacking our tissues.” So like, you know what T-cells, you need to stand down, or you’re going to destroy the whole body. So the T-cells go into something called T-cell exhaustion or T-cell anergy, where they stop working.

What happens when they stop working? You get sick with whatever is coming around. It doesn’t matter what it is. And you stop destroying any cancer cells in your body. Most people don’t know when they’re diagnosed with cancer, that’s been growing maybe 5, maybe 10 years. What kept it in check? Your immune system. When does it flourish? When your immune system is compromised. We have just turned off our T-cells, and we’ve dis-regulated our immune receptors in every possible way. And now we’re wondering why cancer is flourishing.

If you keep stimulating the immune system past the point of T-cell exhaustion (the T-cells have given up the game), they actually start acting really wonky, and they interact with your B-cells to make antibodies. And they do it in a way that is not correct, and it results in auto antibodies against yourself. Alright? This is sort of a switch that is flipped, and it causes aberrant auto-antibody production. There can be genetic predispositions to this, but there’s a good deal of scientific literature showing this process.

So when we see an immune deficiency, cancer, and autoimmunity altogether, there’s a very good reason. And so, this is what chronic immune activation looks like, and why we cannot allow technologies that, whether it’s continually vaccinating our children again and again or making a protein that is stimulating chronic immune activation. We cannot allow that to happen. Alright?

And here’s an example:

A Rise In Cancer

In this is just one case study, although we are seeing a huge increase in cancers. This gentleman, on the 8th of September, and you see all these, most of these dark bodies, not his brain, you know, especially in the shoulder and armpit areas, are these small cancerous growths. And so he was like going to be scheduled for chemotherapy. He got his booster a few weeks later, on the 22nd of September. And eight days later, he went back, and you can see the cancer has just exploded in a way that’s hard to even believe happened.

So we are seeing the rise of these turbo cancers. Again, your immune system keeps cancer in check. So, do we want to continue to play God and dysregulate the immune system at every level?

And when we know that those who those who are just trying to support the immune system are being attacked by this government because there’s only one answer [that is allowed]. All these supplements, things like zinc and vitamin D and turmeric aren’t being allowed. The only thing that’s being allowed is what’s going to make them money.

Thank you



“We were duped” – Doctors Express Anger Towards the CDC and WHO for Their COVID Lies and Are Organizing Under the Global Health Project

|

Source: The Jimmy Dore Show

CLN EDITOR NOTE: There is strong evidence that a new phony pandemic is being planned. The director of the World Health Organization recently warned: “When the next pandemic comes knocking – and it will – we must be ready to answer decisively, collectively, and equitably.” See:

WHO Director-General Tedros Warns World To Prepare For An Even Deadlier Disease Than Covid And Pandemic That ‘Will’ Come ‘Knocking’

Doctors who were duped and betrayed by the CDC, FDA and World Health Organization (WHO) are now organizing under the Global Health Project to push back against the authorities that lied about the pandemic, masks, lockdowns and alternative treatments – so that it does NOT happen again.

Dr. Kat Lindley co-founded the Global Health Project to amplify those voices and ensure that the kind of mass hysteria and misinformation peddled by elite institutions never happens again.

Jimmy Dore speaks with Dr. Lindley about her program and the Global Health Project’s efforts to encourage physicians to raise their voices and restore faith in medical professionals.

Video Summary Including Timestamps

1. 00:00 Doctors form International Watchdog Coalition and speak out against corrupt CDC and WHO, highlighting the need for investigating the truth behind COVID-19 and the loss of trust in government agencies.
1.1 Doctors from around the world, who were originally deceived by the COVID narrative, have formed an International Watchdog Coalition and are speaking out against the CDC and WHO, stating that they are corrupt and not acting in the best interest of the public.
1.2 Dr. Kat Lindley, founder of the Global Health Project, discusses the importance of investigating the truth behind the COVID-19 pandemic and the need for human connection, while also highlighting the potential for future health emergencies.
1.3 Health professionals have lost trust in government agencies like the FDA and CDC due to their failure to provide accurate information during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a broken system and a lack of critical thinking among physicians.

2. 03:40 Doctors are angry about CDC and WHO’s COVID lies, lost trust due to inconsistencies in guidelines, patients being abandoned, scared to seek medical help, and laws criminalizing their ability to create their own protocols to treat COVID controlled by Big Pharma through the government, creating a coalition to push back against it.
2.1 Doctors are angry about the CDC and WHO’s COVID lies, as they followed a narrative that told patients to stay home until they can’t breathe and then go to the ER, and lost focus on serving and taking care of patients.
2.2 Doctors have lost trust in the CDC and WHO due to inconsistencies in their COVID-19 guidelines, leading to patients being abandoned and scared to seek medical help.
2.3 Doctors are angry about laws criminalizing their ability to create their own protocols to treat COVID, which they believe is controlled by Big Pharma through the government, and are creating a coalition to push back against it.

3. 07:08 Doctors and regular people have lost trust in the broken system of the CDC and WHO during the pandemic, and it is now their job to restore trust and for patients to take charge of their own lives and ask questions.
3.1 Doctors and regular people have lost trust in the broken system of the CDC and WHO during the pandemic, and it is now their job to restore trust and for patients to take charge of their own lives and ask questions.
3.2 Doctors are angry about the CDC and WHO’s COVID lies, and believe that we need to have a conversation about not blindly accepting recommendations, as the science now proves that masking and lockdowns have negative effects, and speaking up against these measures can result in being smeared and slandered, with YouTube guidelines prohibiting any statements that go against the WHO, which is funded by Bill Gates.

4. 09:43 Bill Gates’ influence on global healthcare policy and investment in the COVID vaccine, along with the unscientific lockdowns, have led to censorship and anger among doctors.
4.1 Bill Gates, who funds the WHO and is its richest funder, is dictating global healthcare policy despite not having a college degree, and his influence is leading to censorship by Google-owned YouTube.
4.2 Bill Gates invested $55 million in the COVID vaccine, made $500 million, and then criticized the vaccine’s effectiveness after cashing in his stock, while the lockdowns went against all science and were never recommended before COVID.

5. 11:32 Medical professionals expose the corruption of WHO and their billionaire leader invested in new COVID treatment, urging individuals to take charge of their health, finances, education, and faith to restore trust and protect bodily autonomy.
5.1 Medical professionals are blowing the whistle on the corruption of the WHO and their billionaire leader who is invested in a new COVID treatment, with some having been vocal about this for years.
5.2 Individuals need to take charge of their health, finances, education, and faith, and push back against the global masterminds who have hijacked healthcare for their own political and financial gain, in order to restore trust between patients and physicians and create their own communities.
5.3 Bodily autonomy is a value that should not be infringed upon by the state without complete informed consent, as stated in the Nuremberg Code.

6. 14:18 The vaccine mandates were built on a lie as the CDC and WHO never tested to see if the vaccine stopped transmission or contraction of the virus, and those who spoke out against it were smeared as conspiracy theorists, while the news business is corrupted by big Pharma cash.

7. 15:44 Doctors express anger over loss of freedom and emphasize the importance of discussing everything to prevent future COVID-19-like events, while regular people can get involved in the Global Health Project by visiting their website and sharing videos.
7.1 Regular people can get involved in the Global Health Project by visiting their website, downloading and sharing videos, and questioning doctors about potentially safe but unapproved medications.
7.2 Doctors express anger over the loss of human connections and the surrender of freedom during the COVID-19 pandemic and emphasize the importance of discussing everything to prevent such events from happening again.

8. 17:56 Jimmy Dore sarcastically promotes the COVID vaccine as super safe and effective, while acknowledging that it doesn’t stop the spread of the virus, and advertises their stand-up comedy tour.



Covid-19 as a Biological Weapon of Genocide – Dr. David E. Martin PhD – Covid Summit – European Union Parliament

|

The key idea of this presentation by Dr. Deavid E. Martin is that Covid-19 was a deliberate act of biological warfare for financial gain, and there is a need to stop gain of function research, weaponization of nature, and corporate influence in science without liability.

TRANSCRIPT Of Dr. David E. Martin’s Speech at the European Union Parliament MAY 2023
It is a, it is a particularly interesting location for B to be sitting today, given that over a decade ago I sat in this very chair right here in the European Union Parliament.
And at that time I warned the world of what was coming, during that conversation that was hosted at the time by the Green and EFA and a number of the other parties of the European Unions, of various representations.

We were having a conversation on whether Europe should adopt the United States policy of allowing for the patents on biologically derived materials.

And at the time I urged this body and I urged people around the world that the weaponization of nature against humanity had dire consequences.
Tragically, I sit here today, with that unfortunate line that I don’t like to say, which is “I told you so.”

But the fact of the matter is, we’re here not for a reprisal on past decisions. We’re here to actually, once again, come to the face of the human condition and ask the question, who do we want to be?

What do we want humanity to look like?

And rather than seeing this as an exercise in futility, which is very easy from time to time when you’re in the position I’m in, I actually see this not as an exercise in futility.

I see this as one of the greatest opportunities that faces us because we now have a public conversation, which is now front and center in people’s minds.

When this was an esoteric conversation about biological patents, nobody cared.
But when that conversation came home, then it became something people can care about.

So I’m actually quite grateful for this opportunity.

I thank the members of Parliament for hosting this.

I thank all of the translators who I apologize in advance. I will use terminology that is probably very difficult to translate, so my apologies, and I’d also like to acknowledge the fact that many of you are aware of my involvement with this in large part due to the amazing work of my wonderful wife, Kim Martin, who encouraged me at the very early days of this pandemic to get on front of the camera and talk about all the information that I had been sharing among very small groups around the world.

And it was in fact her encouragement that put me in a place where many of you have heard what I have to say.

Ironically, the world that I came from that used to be very popular, my CNBC and Bloomberg presentations, which were televised on mainstream media around the world, was an audience that I lost.

I can confidently say Covid diminished my fame, but I can also confidently say that I’d rather stand among the people with whom I’m standing today than any of the folks that were part of that previous world.
So, this is a much better place to be.

My role today is to set the stage for this conversation in a historical context, because this did not come in the last three years.

This did not come in the last five or six years.

This actually is an ongoing question that probably began here in Europe in the early stages of the mid 19 hundreds, but certainly by 1913, 1914, this conversation started right here in Central Europe. The pandemic that we alleged to have happen in the last few years also did not happen overnight.

In fact, the very specific pandemic using coronavirus began in a very different time.
Most of you don’t know that Coronavirus as a model of a pathogen was isolated in 1965.
Coronavirus was identified in 1965 as one of the first infectious, replicatable viral models that could be used to modify a series of other experiences of human condition.

It was isolated once upon a time and associated with the common cold. But what’s particularly interesting about its isolation in 1965 was that it was immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and modified for a whole host of reasons.

And you heard me correctly, that was 1965. And by the way, these slides are public domain. You’re welcome to look at every single reference. Every comment that I made is based on published material. So do make sure that you look at those references.

But in 1966, the very first COV Coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation, and you heard the date 1966.

I hope you’re getting the point of what I’m saying. This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that’s been long in the making.

A year before I was born, we had the first Trans-Atlantic coronavirus data sharing experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom.

And in 1967, the year I was born, we did the first human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus.

Isn’t that amazing? 56 years ago, the overnight success of a pathogen that’s been 56 years in engineering, and I want that to chill with all of you.

Where were we when we actually allowed in violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties?

Where were we as a human civilization when we thought it was an acceptable thing to do to take a pathogen for the United States and infect the world with it?

Where was that conversation and what should have been that conversation in 1967?

That conversation wasn’t had. Ironically, the common cold was turned into a chimera in the 1970s, and in 1975, 1976 and 1977, we started figuring out how to modify coronavirus by putting it into different animals.

Pigs and dogs.

And not surprisingly, by the time we got to 1990, we found out that coronavirus as a infectious agent was an industrial problem for two primary industries, the industries of dogs and pigs.

Dog breeders and pigs found that Coronavirus created gastrointestinal problems, and that became the basis for Pfizer’s first spike protein vaccine.

Patent filed. Are you ready for this In 1990?

Did you hear what I just said?
1990.

Operation Warpspeed? I’m sorry. Where’s the warp and the speed?

Pfizer 1990. The very first spike protein vaccine for Coronavirus.

Isn’t that fascinating? Isn’t it fascinating that we were, we were told that, well, the spike protein is a new thing.

We just found out that that’s the problem.
No.

As a matter of fact, we didn’t just find out it was not just now.

Now the problem, we found that out in 1990 and filed the first patents on vaccines in 1990 for the spike protein of Coronavirus.

And who would’ve thought Pfizer?

Clearly the innocent organization that does nothing but promote human health.
Clearly, Pfizer, the organization that has not bought the votes in this chamber, in every chamber of every government around the world, not that Pfizer, certainly they wouldn’t have had anything to do with this, but oh yes, they did.

And in 1990 they found out that there was a problem with vaccines.

They didn’t work. You know why they didn’t work?

It turns out that Coronavirus is a very malleable model. It transforms and it changes, and it mutates over time.

As a matter of fact, every publication on vaccines for Coronavirus from 1990 until 2018, every single publication concluded that Coronavirus escapes the vaccine impulse because it modifies and mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective.

And since 1990 to 2018, that is the published science ladies and gentlemen, that’s following the science, following the science is their own indictment of their own programs that said, it doesn’t work.

And there are thousands of publications to that effect, not a few hundred. And not paid for by pharmaceutical companies.

These are publications that are independent scientific research that shows unequivocally including efforts of the chimera modifications made by Ralph Bair in the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.

All of them show vaccines do not work on coronavirus.

That’s the science, and that science has never been disputed.

But then we had an interesting development in 2002, and this date is most important because in 2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented, and I quote, an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus.

Listen to those words …

Infectious replication, defective.

What does that phrase actually mean?

For those of you not familiar with language, let me unpack it for you.
Infectious replication. Defective means a weapon. It means something meant to target an individual but not have collateral damage to other individuals.

That’s what infectious replication defective means.

And that patent was filed in 2002 on work funded by NIAD’s Anthony Fauci from 1999 to 2002, and that work patented at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill mysteriously preceded SARS 1.0 by a year.

“Dave, are you suggesting that SARS 1.0 wasn’t from a wet market in Wuhan?”

“Are you suggesting it might have come from a laboratory in the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill?”

No, I’m not suggesting it. I’m telling you that’s the facts: we engineered SARS. SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon.

The naturally occurring phenomenon is called the common cold. It’s called influenza-like illness. It’s called gastroenteritis.

That’s the naturally occurring coronavirus.

SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to actually attack human beings, and they patented it in 2002.

And in 2003, giant surprise, the CDC filed the patent on Coronavirus isolated from humans in violation once again of biological and chemical weapons, treaties and laws that we have in the United States, and I’m very, very precise on this.

The United States likes to talk about its rights and everything else, and the rule of law and all the nonsense that we like to talk about, but we don’t ratify treaties about, I don’t know, defending humans.

We conspicuously avoid that we actually have a great track record of advocating for human rights and then denying them when it comes to actually being part of the international community, which is a slightly problematic thing.

But let’s get something very clear.

When the CDC, in April of 2003 filed the patent on SARS Coronavirus isolated from humans, what did they do?

They downloaded a sequence from China, and filed a patent on it in the United States.

Any of you familiar with biological and chemical weapons treaties knows that’s a violation. That’s a crime. That’s not an innocent, oops; that’s a crime.

And the United States Patent Office went as far as to reject that patent application on two occasions until the CDC decided to bribe the patent office to override the patent examiner to ultimately issue the patent in 2007 on SARS Coronavirus.

But let’s not let that get away from us, because it turns out that the RT PCR, which was the test that we allegedly were going to use to identify the risks associated with coronavirus, was actually identified as a bioterrorism threat by me in the European Union sponsored events in 2002 and 2003, 20 years ago that happened here in Brussels and across Europe.

In 2005, this particular pathogen was specifically labelled as a bioterrorism and bioweapon platform technology, described as such. That’s not my terminology that I’m applying to it. It was actually described as a bioweapons platform technology in 2005. And from 2005 onwards, it was actually a bio-warfare enabling agent.

It’s official classification from 2005 forward.

I don’t know if that sounds like public health to you, does it?
Biological warfare enabling technology that feels like not public health, that feels like not medicine, that feels like a weapon, designed to take out humanity.

That’s what it feels like, and it feels like that because that’s exactly what it is.
We have been lured into believing that EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA and all of these organizations are what we should be pointing to.

But we’ve been specifically requested to ignore the facts that over $10 billion have been funneled through black operations, through the check of Anthony Fauci and a side-by-side ledger where NIAD has a balance sheet, and next to it is a biodefense balance sheet.
Equivalent dollar-for-dollar matching that no one in the media talks about, and it’s been going on since 2005.

Our gain of function moratorium. The moratorium that was supposed to freeze any efforts to do gain-of-function research.

Conveniently, in the fall of 2014, the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill received a letter from NIAD saying that while the gain of function moratorium on coronavirus in vivo should be suspended, because their grants had already been funded, they received an exemption.

Did you hear what I just said?

A biological weapons lab facility at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill received an exemption from the gain of function moratorium so that by 2016 we could publish the journal article that said SARS Coronavirus is poised for human emergence in 2016 and what, you might ask Dave, was the coronavirus poised for human emergence?

It was WIV ONE: Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus One.

Poised for human emergence in 2016 at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, such that by the time we get to 2017 and 2018, the following phrase entered into common parlance among the community, there is going to be an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen.

The operative word, obviously in that phrase, the word release, does that sound like leak?

Does that sound like a bat and a Pangolin went into a bar in the Wuhan market and hung out and had sex?

And, and lo and behold, we got SARS Cov-2.

No accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen was the terminology used.

And four times in April of 2019, seven months before the allegation of patient number one, four patent applications of Moderna were modified to include the term accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen as the justification for making a vaccine for a thing that did not exist.

If you have not done so, please make sure that you make reference in every investigation to the premeditation nature of this, because it was in September of 2019 that the world was informed.

That we were going to have an accident or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen so that by September 2020 there would be a worldwide acceptance of a universal vaccine template.

That’s their words right in front of you on the screen.

The intent was to get the world to accept a universal vaccine template, and the intent was to use coronavirus to get there.

Let’s, let’s read this because we have to read this into the record everywhere I go.

“Until an infectious disease crisis is very real present and at the emergency threshold that is often largely ignored to sustain the funding base beyond the crisis.”
He said, “we need to increase the public understanding for the need for medical countermeasures, such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine.”

“A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”

Sounds like public health. Sounds like the best of humanity. No.

Ladies and gentlemen, this was premeditated domestic terrorism stated at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2015, published in front of them.

This is an act of biological and chemical warfare perpetrated on the human race, and it was admitted to in writing that this was a financial heist and a financial fraud.
“Investors will follow if they see profit at the end of the process.”

Let me conclude by making five very brief recommendations. The last slide:

Nature was hijacked. This whole story started in 1965 when we decided to hijack a natural model and decide to start manipulating it.

Science was hijacked when the only questions that could be asked were questions authorized under the patent protection of the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, and their equivalent organizations around the world.

We didn’t have independent science. We had hijacked science, and unfortunately there was no moral oversight in violation of all of the codes that we stand for.

There was no independent, financially disinterested independent review board ever impanelled around coronavirus. Not once, not once, not since 1965.

We do not have a single independent IRB ever empanelled, around Coronavirus. So, morality was suspended for medical countermeasures, and ultimately humanity was lost because we decided to allow it to happen.

Our job today is to say, no more gain of function research period. No more weaponization of nature period.

And most importantly, no more corporate patronage of science for their own self-interest unless they assume 100% product liability for every injury and every death that they maintain.

Thank you very much.
Dr David E. Martin
Speaker – Covid Summit – European Union Parliament – May 2023



EXPOSED: The Likelihood of Major Health Complications Following COVID Vaccination Is 13 Times That of Remaining Unvaxxed

|

Article Source: “Comparing Risks: The Right and Wrong Way” by Anette Stahel | Brownstone Institute

In her article on the Brownstone Institute website, Anette Stahel criticizes the methodology used in several large-scale studies sponsored by the American health authorities, particularly the CDC, to evaluate the risks and benefits of COVID-19 vaccination. Stahel argues that these studies make flawed comparisons that undervalue the risks associated with vaccination and overstate the risks of remaining unvaccinated.

Stahel presents an incontrovertible case that when the proper (common sense) methodology is used, the risk of serious conditions after vaccination is about 13 times higher than if one abstained from taking the vaccine.

CLN EDITOR NOTE: Stahel’s calculation is based on current data and does not include the vast number of people who will continue to experience major health issues after taking the jab (see the Swedish report below). Her calculation also does not consider the reality that physicians were barred from utilizing potential life-saving and COVID-mitigating treatments on the unvaxxed, including Ivermectin, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Zinc, and Quercetin. Many hospitalized COVID patients were denied these treatments – even after the family specifically requested them – and instead were given ineffective and potentially harmful drugs like Remdesivir.

RELATED ARTICLE: Her Father Got COVID and Died — But She Believes the CDC, NIH and Hospital Protocols Are What Really Killed Him

RELATED ARTICLE: HUGE! Joe Rogan Just Blew The Lid Off the Mainstream Media Lies About Ivermectin

RELATED ARTICLE: Dr. Zev Zelenko’s Prophylaxis and Treatment Protocols for COVID-19

Stahel notes that while the COVID-19 pandemic appears to be ebbing worldwide, reports of serious symptoms and injuries following COVID-19 vaccination continue to rise. For example, in Sweden, reports have increased steadily over the past year.

CLN EDITOR NOTE: This is NOT unexpected. Over two years ago, virologist Geert Vanden Bossche warned that the COVID vaccine would compromise the immune system.

Stahel asserts that it is essential to compare the entire vaccinated group with the entire unvaccinated group when investigating serious symptoms and injuries following vaccination or infection. However, she claims that the studies she analyzed instead compared the risks of various serious symptoms and injuries after COVID-19 vaccination with the risks of the same ailments after infection in the unvaccinated.

RELATED ARTICLE: Clear Proof the Vaccine is Dangerous and That The CDC Concealed It

This approach, Stahel argues, results in higher risk figures for the option to abstain from the vaccine than for the option to take the vaccine. She asserts that the researchers also chose to look at the risks after confirmed infection rather than estimated infection, which she says further skews the data in favor of vaccination.

Stahel alleges that both the American health authorities and the Swedish Public Health Authority have failed to correct these comparisons in their presentations of the studies. She argues that these authorities appear to consider the comparison between vaccinated and infected unvaccinated groups to be valid, as indicated by their reports, tables, and diagrams.

Stahel states that when she analyzed the results of the studies and used official statistics to make what she believes is the correct comparison, she found that the risk of serious symptoms and injuries after vaccination was many times higher than the risk of corresponding infection-related conditions in the unvaccinated state. She calculated that the risk of serious conditions after vaccination was about 13 times higher than if one abstained from the vaccine.

She argues that the alternative to vaccination is not necessarily infection, but remaining unvaccinated with a chance of contracting the infection. She points out that the risk of contracting COVID-19 for the unvaccinated is not 100%, but significantly lower, varying between about 0.5% and 15% depending on location and timing.

RELATED ARTICLE: CDC Admits Natural Immunity Trumps Vaccine Immunity — 5 Months After Touting Vaccines as Superior

Stahel insists that the comparison between severe symptoms and injuries after vaccination and corresponding afflictions after infection in the unvaccinated should stop. She states that the correct comparison is between symptoms and injuries after vaccination and corresponding conditions in the entire group of unvaccinated people.

Stahel criticizes scientists and health authorities for making incorrect comparisons and for claiming that serious symptoms and injuries linked to vaccination are “very rare”, while failing to inform that the risk of corresponding infection-related afflictions in the unvaccinated state is lower.

In conclusion, Stahel calls into question the logic of vaccinating people if it increases their risk of developing serious afflictions.



Blueberries and Green Beans Join EWG’s ‘Dirty Dozen’ List of Pesticide-Drenched Produce

|

Source: ewg.org

Government tests found 54 different pesticides on blueberries and 84 on green beans

WASHINGTON – Thirty years after a landmark National Academies of Sciences study warning of the dangers posed to children by pesticides, 75 percent of non-organic fruits and vegetables sold in the U.S. are still riddled with the potentially toxic agricultural chemicals, according to the Environmental Working Group’s 2023 Shopper’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce™, released today.

This year, blueberries and green beans join the Dirty Dozen™, the Shopper’s Guide section listing the 12 non-organic, or conventionally grown, fruits and vegetables with the highest amounts of pesticides, based on federal agencies’ tests. Some of the pesticides detected have been banned in the U.S. or Europe because of concerns about how they harm people.

“Despite the abundance of science linking exposure to pesticides with serious health issues, a potentially toxic cocktail of concerning chemicals continues to taint many of the non-organic fruits and vegetables eaten by consumers,” said Alexis Temkin, Ph.D., EWG toxicologist.

The findings underscore the need for stronger regulations around and oversight of how pesticides are used on food crops.

The Shopper’s Guide compiles EWG’s analysis of the latest fruit and vegetable testing data from the Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration. The 2023 edition includes data from 46,569 samples of 46 fruits and vegetables, covering 251 different pesticides.

In addition to the Dirty Dozen, the guide includes the Clean Fifteen™, EWG’s list of the fruits and vegetables with very low or no traces of pesticides. The guide also features a full report on pesticides on produce and more detailed analyses about specific fruits and vegetables and what chemicals were found on them.

“Everyone – adults and kids – should eat more fruits and vegetables, whether organic or not,“ Temkin said. “A produce-rich diet provides many health benefits.

“But in the ongoing absence of meaningful federal oversight, consumers concerned about pesticide exposure can use EWG’s Shopper’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce to navigate the produce aisle in ways that work best for them and their families,” Temkin said.

EWG recommends that consumers buy organic versions of Dirty Dozen produce and choose either conventionally grown or organic versions of Clean Fifteen items..

Blueberries and green beans

Both blueberries and green beans – 11th and 12th, respectively, on this year’s Dirty Dozen – had troubling concentrations of organophosphate insecticides, pesticides that can harm the human nervous system. Nine out of 10 samples of each of the popular foods had residues of pesticides – with some showing traces of up to 17 different pesticides.

Nearly 80 percent of blueberry samples had two or more pesticides. Phosmet was detected on more than 10 percent of blueberry samples and malathion on 9 percent. Both are organophosphates that are toxic to the human nervous system, especially children’s developing brains. In 2015, malathion was classified as probably carcinogenic to humans by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

More than 70 percent of green beans had at least two pesticides, with a combined 84 different pesticides found on the entire crop. Six percent of samples showed residues of acephate, a toxic pesticide the Environmental Protection Agency banned for use on green beans more than 10 years ago. Green beans also had traces of several pesticides banned in the European Union but allowed in the U.S.

The health risks posed by pesticides

Pesticides are toxic by design, created expressly to kill living organisms – insects, plants and fungi considered “pests.” But many pesticides pose health dangers to people, too, including cancer, hormone disruption, and brain and nervous system toxicity. These hazards have been confirmed by independent scientists, physicians, and U.S. and international government agencies.

Most pesticide residues found by the USDA and FDA fall below government limits and are legal. But legal limits don’t always indicate what’s safe for human consumption.

The conventional agriculture industry, and even the EPA, often claim pesticides like chlorpyrifos are safe, right up until the moment they are banned because of overwhelming evidence showing they are toxic to humans.

Children are especially vulnerable to many of the health harms associated with pesticide exposure. Research published by EWG in 2020 found that the EPA, which oversees pesticide safety, fails to adequately consider children in setting legal limits for 90 percent of the most common pesticides.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends parents concerned about their children’s exposure to pesticides consult EWG’s Shopper’s Guide.

“EWG’s Shopper’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce is a key tool for parents and caregivers concerned about protecting vulnerable children from the potential serious risks of consuming even low levels of pesticides in food,” said Dr. Philip Landrigan, renowned public health expert and one of the principal authors of the 1993 National Academies of Sciences study on pesticides in children’s diets.

Also in 1993, EWG released its first report, Pesticides in Children’s Food, which analyzed federal government consumption data and pesticide tests of more than 20,000 samples of food, among other government and industry data. The exhaustive investigation found that millions of U.S. children were receiving up to 35 percent of their entire lifetime dose of some carcinogenic pesticides by age 5.

“The Dirty Dozen and Clean Fifteen provide simple guidelines for how to pursue a diet rich in vital fruits and vegetables, while avoiding the items that might be most contaminated with chemicals,” said Landrigan, director of the Global Public Health Program and Global Observatory on Planetary Health in the Schiller Institute for Integrated Science and Society at Boston College.

###

The Environmental Working Group is a nonprofit, non-partisan organization that empowers people to live healthier lives in a healthier environment. Through research, advocacy and unique education tools, EWG drives consumer choice and civic action. Visit www.ewg.org for more information.



‘No Doubt’ Fauci Funded Gain-of-Function Research That Likely Led to Pandemic, Former CDC Director Tells Lawmakers

|

On March 8, 2023, former CDC director Dr. Robert Redfield testified at the House COVID hearing and said that there is “no doubt” the National Institutes of Health and Dr. Anthony Fauci funded gain-of-function research that likely resulted in the creation of COVID-19 and its subsequent leak.

Source: The Defender | By READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE…

Dr. Robert Redfield, former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), on Wednesday said he has “no doubt” the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Dr. Anthony Fauci funded gain-of-function research that likely resulted in the creation of COVID-19 and its subsequent leak.

Redfield made the statement during the first formal hearing of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.

The hearing included testimony related to the lab leak theory as a plausible explanation as the origin of COVID-19 and how the theory was shut down early in the pandemic in favor of narratives that COVID-19 had zoogenic — or natural — origins.

Committee members and witnesses also debated the future of gain-of-function research.

Other witnesses Wednesday included: Jamie Metzl, Ph.D., J.D., senior fellow at the Atlantic Council; Nicholas Wade, former New York Times science editor and former deputy editor of Nature; and Paul G. Auwaerter, M.D., MBA, clinical director in the Division of Infectious Diseases at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

The hearing followed the subcommittee’s release of a memo revealing that key NIH figures, including Fauci, helped persuade virologists to write an influential article squelching the theory that COVID-19 may have leaked from a lab and asserting the virus evolved naturally.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) last month determined SARS CoV-2 most likely emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China — a theory later endorsed by FBI Director Christopher Wray. These developments helped lead to a Senate vote to declassify U.S. intelligence documents on the origins of COVID-19.

Gain-of-function research ‘caused the greatest pandemic our world has seen’

Some of the witnesses called for gain-of-function research to be slowed down, paused or stopped entirely.

Redfield testified that the “COVID-19 pandemic presents a case study on the potential dangers of such research,” and said, “we should call for a moratorium on gain-of-function research until we have a broader debate and we come to a consensus as a community about the value of [such] research.”

READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE…

Watch more of Dr. Redfield’s testimony:



Anthony Fauci Admits That Vaccines Do NOT Generate Immunity Against Covid, Flu, And Other Respiratory Diseases

|

Source: The WinePress

“Because these viruses generally do not elicit complete and durable protective immunity by themselves, they have not to date been effectively controlled by licensed or experimental vaccines.”

After three years of habitually urging the public to get a Covid-19 vaccine, to not only protect ourselves but others around us from contracting and spreading Covid, that the vaccines were the only way to “stop the spread,” and after nearly 80% of the American population has received at least one dose, and 68% got two, and 33% with three injections – Dr. Anthony Fauci and his constituents are now saying that both old and new vaccines are not effective in generating immunity against viral diseases like Covid or the flu.

Fauci, along with Dr. David M. Morens, Senior Advisor to the Director at National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Jeffery K. Taubenberger, M.D., Ph.D., a Senior Investigator for Viral Pathogenesis & Evolution Section at NIAID – recently published a paper in the journal Cell, that discusses vaccines and their effectiveness against ailments like Covid, influenza, RSV, and the common cold.

The paper is called “Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses.”

In the opening summary, the doctors wrote:

“Because these viruses generally do not elicit complete and durable protective immunity by themselves, they have not to date been effectively controlled by licensed or experimental vaccines.

In this review, we examine challenges that have impeded development of effective mucosal respiratory vaccines, emphasizing that all of these viruses replicate extremely rapidly in the surface epithelium and are quickly transmitted to other hosts, within a narrow window of time before adaptive immune responses are fully marshaled.

We discuss possible approaches to developing next-generation vaccines against these viruses, in consideration of several variables such as vaccine antigen configuration, dose and adjuventation, route and timing of vaccination, vaccine boosting, adjunctive therapies, and options for public health vaccination polices.”

In the early introduction of the paper, the authors admit that long before Covid fears were on the scene the flu was the dominant annual threat, but had “less than suboptimal vaccines” available to the public to prevent infection.

The authors followed that with this admission:

“Over the years, influenza vaccines have never been able to elicit durable protective immunity against seasonal influenza virus strains, even against non-drifted strains.

Although current influenza vaccines reduce the risk of severe disease, hospitalization, and death to some degree, their effectiveness against clinically apparent infection is decidedly suboptimal, ranging from 14% to 60% over the past 15 influenza seasons.”

READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE….



Moderna CEO Admits That In 2019 He KNEW In Advance that “Next Year Is Going To Be a Pandemic”

|

Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel, speaking at a World Economic Forum event, admitted that he knew in 2019 (before the pandemic started) that Moderna would have to increase their vaccine production to a billion doses in 2020 because “next year is going to be a pandemic.” Check it out:

.
Also, check out the article and video referenced in the above video:

Shocking New Study Reveals Covid Jabs Are Actually ‘Weapons of Mass Depopulation’



Covid-19 Vaccines: What They Are, How They Work, and Possible Causes of Injuries | Capitol Hill Forum Highlights + Full Hearing

|

U.S. Senator Ron Johnson hosted a forum of world-renowned experts in Public Health, Science, Medicine, Law, and Journalism, in a public forum titled, “Covid-19 Vaccines: What They Are, How They Work, and Possible Causes of Injuries,” held in the U.S. Senate’s Hart Building, on Capitol Hill on December 7, 2022. You will also hear testimony from victims of Covid vaccine injury.

Speakers Include Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Robert Malone, ICAN Attorney, Aaron Siri, Esq., OpenVAERS Founder, Liz Willner, Edward Dowd, Dr. Harvey Risch, Journalist, Del Bigtree, and more.

Watch the highlights immediately below and the full hearing below that:

https://consciouslifenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Senate-hearing360p.mp4

Source: The Highwire
.

Note: Also check out the brilliant new feature on The Highwire consisting of short, factual clips about Covid and the jab that you can watch and share:
https://TheHighwire.com/GetFactsinated



Died Suddenly – Full Documentary

|

Died Suddenly graphically shows long, calamari-like clots being extracted from the blood vessels of people who died after taking the jab. Also discussed is the dramatic increase in stillbirths.

Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world – even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet… we never seem to believe them.

The Stew Peters Network is proud to present DIED SUDDENLY, from the award-winning filmmakers, Matthew Skow and Nicholas Stumphauzer.



Some of Those Who Ridiculed and Shunned the Unvaxxed Now Want to Be Forgiven

|


.

Here’s the article that is featured in the above video:

LET’S DECLARE A PANDEMIC AMNESTY

The Jab NEVER Worked as Advertised by Fauci (2-Min Video)

And the Jab Does NOT Stop Transmission (Pfizer Admitted Their Jab Was Never Tested for That)


.

Also, see this in-depth article by Dr. Mercola about Pfizer’s admission:

‘Speed of Science’ — A Scandal Beyond Your Wildest Nightmare

And the article that Dr. Mercola wrote over a year ago about the jab NOT stopping Covid transmission:

Vaccine Passports: Why Bother if Shots Don’t Prevent Infection, Transmission?

Sadly, The Jab Is Killing People in Unprecedented Numbers

Here’s Why the Jab Is Killing People (start the video at 14:00)

Also, check out Dr. Botha’s incredible footage showing what’s in the jab:

https://consciouslifenews.com/blood-doctor-zandre-botha-reveals-horrific-findings-after-examining-covid-vials-and-the-blood-of-vaxxed-patients/11208338/

Ben Shapiro ADMITS He Was Fooled

“It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” ― Mark Twain

https://winepressnews.com/2022/10/26/ben-shapiro-says-we-were-lied-to-by-everyone-after-advocating-everyone-get-a-covid-vaccine-for-over-a-year/

Is there anybody out there who was also fooled and wants to apologize to a friend or loved one for shaming and shunning them because they refused to take the jab? If so, please do so. It will help to heal the emotional trauma of being shunned.

Personally, I forgive everyone who blindly followed orders, got the jab, and ridiculed others for not doing likewise. It’s quite possible that they were being mind controlled or under the influence of mass psychosis.

However, I do not forgive those who are knowingly committing genocide.



DIED SUDDENLY | Official Trailer – Streaming November 21st

|

Source: Stew Peters Network

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.” ~ The Georgia Guidestones

Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world – even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet…we never seem to believe them. In this Stew Peters Network EXCLUSIVE, the award-winning filmmakers behind WATCH THE WATER and THESE LITTLE ONES present the truth about the greatest ongoing mass genocide in human history.

Watch the 4-minute trailer for the upcoming movie “Died Suddenly” about the massive number of sudden deaths after taking the jab. The full movie will be available on November 21, 2022 – one day before the 59th anniversary of the JFK assassination.



Act NOW: Demand CDC + Elected Officials Stop Covid Mandates (After ACIP Voted To Add COVID-19 Injections to the Childhood Schedule)

|

Source: Children’s Health Defense

The regulatory agencies and their advisory committees have gone amok. It’s time for people to stop consenting and stop complying.

Act Now: Demand CDC + Elected Officials Stop COVID Mandates

Despite immense blowback, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted unanimously to add COVID-19 injections to its recommended schedule of vaccinations for infants, children, and adolescents. The committee members’ votes solidify their steadfast loyalty to protecting pharma profits at the cost of children’s lives. This is the first step to granting permanent, blanket liability protection for all current and future COVID-19 injections.

This is a declaration of war on our children. The responsibility to be unrelenting as we defend the next generation from Big Pharma now falls on us. In the coming months, nearly every state in the nation will universally adopt the CDC’s recommended vaccination schedule.

This vote solidifies the capture and corruption of the agencies put in place to protect public health. It’s clear this is not about protecting public health rather protecting Big Pharma by granting permanent liability protection. With the addition of this vaccine to the childhood schedule there will be zero recourse for the injured moving forward.

We need YOU to hold the line and remind CDC, FDA and our elected officials that it’s their duty to protect the public health of American children and citizens. The risks demonstrably outweigh the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination in children. Vaccines authorized for emergency use are not permitted to be recommended to the childhood schedule.

There is no emergency in our children that would warrant the hasty and unscientific addition of a vaccine that has not been proven safe or effective.

Act Now: Demand CDC + Elected Officials Stop COVID Mandates

We know you are outraged and want to take action immediately. There are two things you can do. First, demand CDC and elected officials protect our children from COVID-19 mandates.

Next, get ahead of school mandates by reaching out to your own school district’s superintendent, and your state’s education commissioner to plead for their intercession on behalf of our children. Make clear to your superintendent and commissioner that exemptions are not enough and that you will be pulling your child from school if this vaccine is mandated for attendance, costing the district tens of thousands of dollars in funding. Parents hold the power — don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is implementing many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.



Clear Proof the Vaccine is Dangerous and That The CDC Concealed It

|

By: A Midwestern Doctor (click the link to read the full article)

Aaron Siri was finally able to force the CDC to relinquish their V-safe data, which showed over 10% of recipients suffered significant adverse reactions to vaccination. This article will explain why that is so important.

Introduction

One of the major challenges with the COVID-19 vaccination has been that it has been impossible to get any clear safety data on it. The two key issues have been:

Suppression of Data Showing The Vaccines Were Not Safe:

  • Clinical trials of the vaccines were for all practical purposes fraudulent and massively underreporting adverse events.
  • Many of the adverse event databases are not being reported by the government unless they are anonymously leaked by a whistleblower (e.g. here, here or here) or forced into the open by a lawsuit.
  • Mass censorship of reporting “unsafe” adverse responses to vaccination on every media platform.

For example, it was recently revealed that the Israeli government deliberately concealed concerning signs of vaccine safety so that it could push the vaccine through. Given that Israel’s government served as Pfizer’s laboratory for their vaccine, this was of immense consequence globally as governments around the world pushed the vaccine forward on the basis of Pfizer’s fraudulent safety data. Steve Kirsch also has been able to demonstrate that the CDC’s committee that determines the appropriateness of these vaccines is willfully ignoring this data.

Design Flaws in the Existing Adverse Event Reporting Systems:

  • Massive underreporting occurring globally within the existing vaccine safety monitoring systems (e.g. VAERS).
  • It being impossible to know the denominator (how many total people were the adverse reactions observed in) to calculate the actual adverse event rate that is occurring.
  • Since VAERS is a passive reporting system, it is “not possible” to determine causality from it.

Because of this, VAERS has been able to demonstrate that the COVID-19 vaccine is much more dangerous that any previous vaccination, but nothing has been done with its data because it is not “reliable.”

VAERS thus occupies a curious position. It is repeatedly cited when it is needed (e.g. to fulfill the required pharmacovigilance role for the FDA) but disparaged as worthless whenever its data is cited to suggest potential harm from vaccination. Many have recognized the shortcomings in VAERS, and attempts have been made to produce more reliable systems, however as these systems tend to then produce evidence vaccines are in fact quite harmful, they are then scrapped (e.g. the ESP:VAERS project).

V-Safe

Due to the unprecedented nature of the “emergency” COVID-19 vaccination campaign (a completely novel vaccine was developed in one-tenth of the time normally required for the basic safety testing to bring a vaccine to market and then forced onto the entire world), a significant amount of the safety testing had to be performed after the vaccine had already been given to the world’s population.

I cannot find direct proof of this, but I am relatively certain that it was decided that since the vaccine had to be tested on the general population and no existing mechanism existed to effectively track vaccine safety, V-Safe was developed to fulfill this role.

V-Safe briefly was a phone app the initial recipients of the vaccine (e.g. healthcare workers who could be expected to be reliable reporters of adverse events) were given and instructed to use to communicate to report their experiences. This approach is very important because this data was prospective (this data is always more reliable than retrospective data and considered necessary to demonstrate causality) and because the total number of participants was known (which is necessary to demonstrate the rate at which adverse events occurred). The CDC was also supposed to follow up with individuals who reported adverse events, although I am somewhat doubtful this occurred.

Here are some brief descriptions of V-Safe:

Not surprisingly, V-safe’s data was never made available to the public, with the CDC giving the excuse that they needed to anonymize the data in order to protect patient confidentiality so that releasing the data could be stalled out indefinitely. To any astute observer, this is a clear admission of the data within V-safe was very concerning as the CDC could not afford to publicly release it (the federal government will always try to come up with excuses to indefinitely stall on releasing incriminating data best shown with the FDA demanding decades to curate and release Pfizer’s documents).

Fortunately, Aaron Siri, an attorney who has spent years fighting for vaccine safety on behalf of ICAN and Del Bigtree, after 463 days of work was finally able to force the CDC to release the V-Safe data. Given how concerning this data this raises serious concerns on who decided it was appropriate to withhold that data from the public.

READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE…



COVID UPDATE: What Is the TRUTH? by Dr. Russell L. Blaylock (Comprehensive Summary Published on PubMed/NIH)

|

Article Source: National Library of Medicine | by Russell L. Blaylock

The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history, characterized by official lies in an unending stream lead by government bureaucracies, medical associations, medical boards, the media, and international agencies.[,,] We have witnessed a long list of unprecedented intrusions into medical practice, including attacks on medical experts, destruction of medical careers among doctors refusing to participate in killing their patients and a massive regimentation of health care, led by non-qualified individuals with enormous wealth, power and influence.

For the first time in American history a president, governors, mayors, hospital administrators and federal bureaucrats are determining medical treatments based not on accurate scientifically based or even experience based information, but rather to force the acceptance of special forms of care and “prevention”—including remdesivir, use of respirators and ultimately a series of essentially untested messenger RNA vaccines. For the first time in history medical treatment, protocols are not being formulated based on the experience of the physicians treating the largest number of patients successfully, but rather individuals and bureaucracies that have never treated a single patient—including Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, EcoHealth Alliance, the CDC, WHO, state public health officers and hospital administrators.[,]

The media (TV, newspapers, magazines, etc), medical societies, state medical boards and the owners of social media have appointed themselves to be the sole source of information concerning this so-called “pandemic”. Websites have been removed, highly credentialed and experienced clinical doctors and scientific experts in the field of infectious diseases have been demonized, careers have been destroyed and all dissenting information has been labeled “misinformation” and “dangerous lies”, even when sourced from top experts in the fields of virology, infectious diseases, pulmonary critical care, and epidemiology. These blackouts of truth occur even when this information is backed by extensive scientific citations from some of the most qualified medical specialists in the world.[] Incredibly, even individuals, such as Dr. Michael Yeadon, a retired ex-Chief Scientist, and vice-president for the science division of Pfizer Pharmaceutical company in the UK, who charged the company with making an extremely dangerous vaccine, is ignored and demonized. Further, he, along with other highly qualified scientists have stated that no one should take this vaccine.

Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the most cited experts in his field, who has successfully treated over 2000 COVID patients by using a protocol of early treatment (which the so-called experts completely ignored), has been the victim of a particularly vicious assault by those benefiting financially from the vaccines. He has published his results in peer-reviewed journals, reporting an 80% reduction in hospitalizations and a 75% reduction in deaths by using early treatment.[] Despite this, he is under an unrelenting series of attacks by the information controllers, none of which have treated a single patient.

Neither Anthony Fauci, the CDC, WHO nor any medical governmental establishment has ever offered any early treatment other than Tylenol, hydration and call an ambulance once you have difficulty breathing. This is unprecedented in the entire history of medical care as early treatment of infections is critical to saving lives and preventing severe complications. Not only have these medical organizations and federal lapdogs not even suggested early treatment, they attacked anyone who attempted to initiate such treatment with all the weapons at their disposal—loss of license, removal of hospital privileges, shaming, destruction of reputations and even arrest.[]

A good example of this outrage against freedom of speech and providing informed consent information is the recent suspension by the medical board in Maine of Dr. Meryl Nass’ medical license and the ordering of her to undergo a psychiatric evaluation for prescribing Ivermectin and sharing her expertise in this field.[,] I know Dr, Nass personally and can vouch for her integrity, brilliance and dedication to truth. Her scientific credentials are impeccable. This behavior by a medical licensing board is reminiscent of the methodology of the Soviet KGB during the period when dissidents were incarcerated in psychiatric gulags to silence their dissent.

OTHER UNPRECEDENTED ATTACKS

Another unprecedented tactic is to remove dissenting doctors from their positions as journal editors, reviewers and retracting of their scientific papers from journals, even after these papers have been in print. Until this pandemic event, I have never seen so many journal papers being retracted— the vast majority promoting alternatives to official dogma, especially if the papers question vaccine safety. Normally a submitted paper or study is reviewed by experts in the field, called peer review. These reviews can be quite intense and nit picking in detail, insisting that all errors within the paper be corrected before publication. So, unless fraud or some other major hidden problem is discovered after the paper is in print, the paper remains in the scientific literature.

We are now witnessing a growing number of excellent scientific papers, written by top experts in the field, being retracted from major medical and scientific journals weeks, months and even years after publication. A careful review indicates that in far too many instances the authors dared question accepted dogma by the controllers of scientific publications—especially concerning the safety, alternative treatments or efficacy of vaccines.[,] These journals rely on extensive adverting by pharmaceutical companies for their revenue. Several instances have occurred where powerful pharmaceutical companies exerted their influence on owners of these journals to remove articles that in any way question these companies’ products.[,,]

Worse still is the actual designing of medical articles for promoting drugs and pharmaceutical products that involve fake studies, so-called ghostwritten articles.[,] Richard Horton is quoted by the Guardian as saying “journals have devolved into information laundering operations for the pharmaceutical industry.”[,] Proven fraudulent “ghostwritten” articles sponsored by pharmaceutical giants have appeared regularly in top clinical journals, such as JAMA, and New England Journal of Medicine—never to be removed despite proven scientific abuse and manipulation of data.[,]

Ghostwritten articles involve using planning companies whose job it is to design articles containing manipulated data to support a pharmaceutical product and then have these articles accepted by high-impact clinical journals, that is, the journals most likely to affect clinical decision making of doctors. Further, they supply doctors in clinical practice with free reprints of these manipulated articles. The Guardian found 250 companies engaged in this ghostwriting business. The final step in designing these articles for publication in the most prestigious journals is to recruit well recognized medical experts from prestigious institutions, to add their name to these articles. These recruited medical authors are either paid upon agreeing to add their name to these pre- written articles or they do so for the prestige of having their name on an article in a prestigious medical journal.[]

Of vital importance is the observation by experts in the field of medical publishing that nothing has been done to stop this abuse. Medical ethicists have lamented that because of this widespread practice “you can’t trust anything.” While some journals insist on disclosure information, most doctors reading these articles ignore this information or excuse it and several journals make disclosure more difficult by requiring the reader to find the disclosure statements at another location. Many journals do not police such statements and omissions by authors are common and without punishment.

As concerns the information made available to the public, virtually all the media is under the control of these pharmaceutical giants or others who are benefitting from this “pandemic”. Their stories are all the same, both in content and even wording. Orchestrated coverups occur daily and massive data exposing the lies being generated by these information controllers are hidden from the public. All data coming over the national media (TV, newspaper and magazines), as well as the local news you watch every day, comes only from “official” sources—most of which are lies, distortions or completely manufactured out of whole cloth—all aimed to deceive the public.

Television media receives the majority of its advertising budget from the international pharmaceutical companies—this creates an irresistible influence to report all concocted studies supporting their vaccines and other so-called treatments.[] In 2020 alone the pharmaceutical industries spent 6.56 billion dollars on such advertising.[,] Pharma TV advertising amounted to 4.58 billion, an incredible 75% of their budget. That buys a lot of influence and control over the media. World famous experts within all fields of infectious diseases are excluded from media exposure and from social media should they in any way deviate against the concocted lies and distortions by the makers of these vaccines. In addition, these pharmaceutical companies spend tens of millions on social media advertising, with Pfizer leading the pack with $55 million in 2020.[]

While these attacks on free speech are terrifying enough, even worse is the virtually universal control hospital administrators have exercised over the details of medical care in hospitals. These hirelings are now instructing doctors which treatment protocols they will adhere to and which treatments they will not use, no matter how harmful the “approved” treatments are or how beneficial the “unapproved” treatments are.[,]

Never in the history of American medicine have hospital administrators dictated to its physicians how they will practice medicine and what medications they can use. The CDC has no authority to dictate to hospitals or doctors concerning medical treatments. Yet, most physicians complied without the slightest resistance.

The federal Care Act encouraged this human disaster by offering all US hospitals up to 39,000 dollars for each ICU patient they put on respirators, despite the fact that early on it was obvious that the respirators were a major cause of death among these unsuspecting, trusting patients. In addition, the hospitals received 12,000 dollars for each patient that was admitted to the ICU—explaining, in my opinion and others, why all federal medical bureaucracies (CDC, FDA, NIAID, NIH, etc) did all in their power to prevent life- saving early treatments.[] Letting patients deteriorate to the point they needed hospitalization, meant big money for all hospitals. A growing number of hospitals are in danger of bankruptcy, and many have closed their doors, even before this “pandemic”.[] Most of these hospitals are now owned by national or international corporations, including teaching hospitals.[]

It is also interesting to note that with the arrival of this “pandemic” we have witnessed a surge in hospital corporate chains buying up a number of these financially at-risk hospitals.[,] It has been noted that billions in Federal Covid aid is being used by these hospital giants to acquire these financially endangered hospitals, further increasing the power of corporate medicine over physician independence. Physicians expelled from their hospitals are finding it difficult to find other hospitals staffs to join since they too may be owned by the same corporate giant. As a result, vaccine mandate policies include far larger numbers of hospital employees. For example, Mayo Clinic fired 700 employees for exercising their right to refuse a dangerous, essentially untested experimental vaccine.[,] Mayo Clinic did this despite the fact that many of these employees worked during the worst of the epidemic and are being fired when the Omicron variant is the dominant strain of the virus, has the pathogenicity of a common cold for most and the vaccines are ineffective in preventing the infection.

In addition, it has been proven that the vaccinated asymptomatic person has a nasopharyngeal titer of the virus as high as an infected unvaccinated person. If the purpose of the vaccine mandate is to prevent viral spread among the hospital staff and patients, then it is the vaccinated who present the greatest risk of transmission, not the unvaccinated. The difference is that a sick unvaccinated person would not go to work, the asymptomatic vaccinated spreader will.

What we do know is that major medical centers, such as Mayo Clinic, receive tens of millions of dollars in NIH grants each year as well as monies from the pharmaceutical makers of these experimental “vaccines”. In my view, that is the real consideration driving these policies. If this could be proven in a court of law the administrators making these mandates should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and sued by all injured parties.

The hospital bankruptcy problem has grown increasingly acute due to hospitals vaccine mandates and resulting large number of hospitals staff, especially nurses, refusing to be forcibly vaccinated.[,] This is all unprecedented in the history of medical care. Doctors within hospitals are responsible for the treatment of their individual patients and work directly with these patients and their families to initiate these treatments. Outside organizations, such as the CDC, have no authority to intervene in these treatments and to do so exposes the patients to grave errors by an organization that has never treated a single COVID-19 patient.

When this pandemic started, hospitals were ordered by the CDC to follow a treatment protocol that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of patients, most of whom would have recovered had proper treatments been allowed.[,] The majority of these deaths could have been prevented had doctors been allowed to use early treatment with such products as Ivermectin, hydroxy-chloroquine and a number of other safe drugs and natural compounds. It has been estimated, based on results by physicians treating the most covid patients successfully, that of the 800,000 people that we are told died from Covid, 640,000 could have not only been saved, but could have, in many cases, returned to their pre-infection health status had mandated early treatment with these proven methods been used. This neglect of early treatment constitutes mass murder. That means 160,000 would have actually died, far less than the number dying at the hands of bureaucracies, medical associations and medical boards that refused to stand up for their patients. According to studies of early treatment of thousands of patients by brave, caring doctors, seventy-five to eighty percent of the deaths could have been prevented.[,]

Incredibly, these knowledgeable doctors were prevented from saving these Covid-19 infected people. It should be an embarrassment to the medical profession that so many doctors mindlessly followed the deadly protocols established by the controllers of medicine.

One must also keep in mind that this event never satisfied the criteria for a pandemic. The World Health Organization changed the criteria to make this a pandemic. To qualify for a pandemic status the virus must have a high mortality rate for the vast majority of people, which it didn’t (with a 99.98% survival rate), and it must have no known existing treatments—which this virus had—in fact, a growing number of very successful treatments.

The draconian measures established to contain this contrived “pandemic” have never been shown to be successful, such as masking the public, lockdowns, and social distancing. A number of carefully done studies during previous flu seasons demonstrated that masks, of any kind, had never prevented the spread of the virus among the public.[]

In fact, some very good studies suggested that the masks actually spread the virus by giving people a false sense of security and other factors, such as the observation that people were constantly breaking sterile technique by touching their mask, improper removal and by leakage of infectious aerosols around the edges of the mask. In addition masks were being disposed of in parking lots, walking trails, laid on tabletops in restaurants and placed in pockets and purses.

Within a few minutes of putting on the mask, a number of pathogenic bacteria can be cultured from the masks, putting the immune suppressed person at a high risk of bacterial pneumonia and children at a higher risk of meningitis.[] A study by researchers at the University of Florida cultured over 11 pathogenic bacteria from the inside of the mask worn by children in schools.[]

It was also known that children were at essentially no risk of either getting sick from the virus or transmitting it.

In addition, it was also known that wearing a mask for over 4 hours (as occurs in all schools) results in significant hypoxia (low blood oxygen levels) and hypercapnia (high CO2 levels), which have a number of deleterious effects on health, including impairing the development of the child’s brain.[,,]

We have known that brain development continues long after the grade school years. A recent study found that children born during the “pandemic” have significantly lower IQs—yet school boards, school principals and other educational bureaucrats are obviously unconcerned.[]

TOOLS OF THE INDOCTRINATION TRADE

The designers of this pandemic anticipated a pushback by the public and that major embarrassing questions would be asked. To prevent this, the controllers fed the media a number of tactics, one of the most commonly used was and is the “fact check” scam. With each confrontation with carefully documented evidence, the media “fact checkers” countered with the charge of “misinformation”, and an unfounded “conspiracy theory” charge that was, in their lexicon, “debunked”. Never were we told who the fact checkers were or the source of their “debunking” information—we were just to believe the “fact checkers”. A recent court case established under oath that facebook “fact checkers” used their own staff opinion and not real experts to check “facts”.[] When sources are in fact revealed they are invariably the corrupt CDC, WHO or Anthony Fauci or just their opinion. Here is a list of things that were labeled as “myths” and “misinformation” that were later proven to be true.

  • The asymptomatic vaccinated are spreading the virus equally as with unvaccinated symptomatic infected.
  • The vaccines cannot protect adequately against new variants, such as Delta and Omicron.
  • Natural immunity is far superior to vaccine immunity and is most likely lifelong.
  • Vaccine immunity not only wanes after several months, but all immune cells are impaired for prolonged periods, putting the vaccinated at a high risk of all infections and cancer.
  • COVID vaccines can cause a significant incidence of blood clots and other serious side effects
  • The vaccine proponents will demand numerous boosters as each variant appears on the scene.
  • Fauci will insist on the covid vaccine for small children and even babies.
  • Vaccine passports will be required to enter a business, fly in a plane, and use public transportation
  • There will be internment camps for the unvaccinated (as in Australia, Austria and Canada)
  • The unvaccinated will be denied employment.
  • There are secret agreements between the government, elitist institutions, and vaccine makers
  • Many hospitals were either empty or had low occupancy during the pandemic.
  • The spike protein from the vaccine enters the nucleus of the cell, altering cell DNA repair function.
  • Hundreds of thousands have been killed by the vaccines and many times more have been permanently damaged.
  • Early treatment could have saved the lives of most of the 700,000 who died.
  • Vaccine-induced myocarditis (which was denied initially) is a significant problem and clears over a short period.
  • Special deadly lots (batches) of these vaccines are mixed with the mass of other Covid-19 vaccines

Several of these claims by those opposing these vaccines now appear on the CDC website—most still identified as “myths”. Today, extensive evidence has confirmed that each of these so-called “myths” were in fact true. Many are even admitted by the “saint of vaccines”, Anthony Fauci. For example, we were told, even by our cognitively impaired President, that once the vaccine was released all the vaccinated people could take off their masks. Oops! We were told shortly afterward— the vaccinated have high concentrations (titers) of the virus in their noses and mouths (nasopharynx) and can transmit the virus to others in which they come into contact—especially their own family members. On go the masks once again— in fact double masking is recommended. The vaccinated are now known to be the main superspreaders of the virus and hospitals are filled with the sick vaccinated and people suffering from serious vaccine complications.[,,]

Another tactic by the vaccine proponents is to demonize those who reject being vaccinated for a variety of reasons. The media refers to these critically thinking individuals as “anti-vaxxers”, “vaccine deniers”, “Vaccine resisters”, “murders”, “enemies of the greater good” and as being the ones prolonging the pandemic. I have been appalled by the vicious, often heartless attacks by some of the people on social media when a parent or loved one relates a story of the terrible suffering and eventual death, they or their loved one suffered as a result of the vaccines. Some psychopaths tweet that they are glad that the loved one died or that the dead vaccinated person was an enemy of good for telling of the event and should be banned. This is hard to conceptualize. This level of cruelty is terrifying, and signifies the collapse of a moral, decent, and compassionate society.

It is bad enough for the public to sink this low, but the media, political leaders, hospital administrators, medical associations and medical licensing boards are acting in a similar morally dysfunctional and cruel way.

LOGIC, REASONING, AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE HAS DISAPPEARED IN THIS EVENT

Has scientific evidence, carefully done studies, clinical experience and medical logic had any effect on stopping these ineffective and dangerous vaccines? Absolutely not! The draconian efforts to vaccinate everyone on the planet continues (except the elite, postal workers, members of Congress and other insiders).[,]

In the case of all other drugs and previous conventional vaccines under review by the FDA, the otherwise unexplained deaths of 50 or less individuals would result in a halt in further distribution of the product, as happened on 1976 with the swine flu vaccine. With over 18,000 deaths being reported by the VAERS system for the period December 14, 2020 and December 31st, 2021 as well as 139,126 serious injuries (including deaths) for the same period there is still no interest in stopping this deadly vaccine program.[] Worse, there is no serious investigation by any government agency to determine why these people are dying and being seriously and permanently injured by these vaccines.[,] What we do see is a continuous series of coverups and evasions by the vaccine makers and their promoters.

The war against effective cheap and very safe repurposed drugs and natural compounds, that have proven beyond all doubt to have saved millions of lives all over the world, has not only continued but has stepped up in intensity.[,,]

Doctors are told they cannot provide these life-saving compounds for their patients and if they do, they will be removed from the hospital, have their medical license removed or be punished in many other ways. A great many pharmacies have refused to fill prescriptions for lvermectin or hydroxy- chloroquine, despite the fact that millions of people have taken these drugs safely for over 60 years in the case of hydroxy chloroquine and decades for Ivermectin.[,] This refusal to fill prescriptions is unprecedented and has been engineered by those wanting to prevent alternative methods of treatment, all based on protecting vaccine expansion to all. Several companies that make hydroxy chloroquine agreed to empty their stocks of the drug by donating them to the Strategic National Stockpile, making this drug far more difficult to get.[] Why would the government do that when over 30 well-done studies have shown that this drug reduced deaths anywhere from 66% to 92% in other countries, such as India, Egypt, Argentina, France, Nigeria, Spain, Peru, Mexico, and others?[]

The critics of these two life-saving drugs are most often funded by Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci, both of which are making millions from these vaccines.[,]

To further stop the use of these drugs, the pharmaceutical industry and Bill Gates/Anthony Fauci funded fake research to make the case that hydroxy chloroquine was a dangerous drug and could damage the heart.[] To make this fraudulent case the researchers administered the sickest of covid patients a near lethal dose of the drug, in a dose far higher than used on any covid patient by Dr. Kory, McCullough and other “real”, and compassionate doctors, physicians who were actually treating covid patients.[]

The controlled, lap-dog media, of course, hammered the public with stories of the deadly effect of hydroxy- chloroquine, all with a terrified look of fake panic. All these stories of ivermectin dangers were shown to be untrue and some of the stories were incredibly preposterous.[,]

The attack on Ivermectin was even more vicious than against hydroxy-chloroquine. All of this, and a great deal more is meticulously chronicled in Robert Kennedy, Jr’s excellent new book—The Real Anthony Fauci. Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.[] If you are truly concerned with the truth and with all that has occurred since this atrocity started, you must not only read, but study this book carefully. It is fully referenced and covers all topics in great detail. This is a designed human tragedy of Biblical proportions by some of the most vile, heartless, psychopaths in history.

Millions have been deliberately killed and crippled, not only by this engineered virus, but by the vaccine itself and by the draconian measures used by these governments to “control the pandemic spread”. We must not ignore the “deaths by despair” caused by these draconian measures, which can exceed hundreds of thousands. Millions have starved in third world countries as a result. In the United States alone, of the 800,000 who died, claimed by the medical bureaucracies, well over 600,000 of these deaths were the result of the purposeful neglect of early treatment, blocking the use of highly effective and safe repurposed drugs, such as hydroxy-chloroquine and Ivermectin, and the forced use of deadly treatments such as remdesivir and use of ventilators. This does not count the deaths of despair and neglected medical care caused by the lockdown and hospital measures forced on healthcare systems.

To compound all this, because of vaccine mandates among all hospital personnel, thousands of nurses and other hospital workers have resigned or been fired.[,,] This has resulted in critical shortages of these vital healthcare workers and dangerous reductions of ICU beds in many hospitals. In addition, as occurred in the Lewis County Healthcare System, a specialty-hospital system in Lowville, N.Y., closed its maternity unit following the resignation of 30 hospital staff over the state’s disastrous vaccine mandate orders. The irony in all these cases of resignations is that the administrators unhesitatingly accepted these mass staffing losses despite rantings about suffering from short staffing during a “crisis”. This is especially puzzling when we learned that the vaccines did not prevent viral transmission and the present predominant variant is of extremely low pathogenicity.

DANGERS OF THE VACCINES ARE INCREASINGLY REVEALED BY SCIENCE

While most researchers, virologists, infectious disease researchers and epidemiologists have been intimidated into silence, a growing number of high integrity individuals with tremendous expertise have come forward to tell the truth—that is, that these vaccines are deadly.

Most new vaccines must go through extensive safety testing for years before they are approved. New technologies, such as the mRNA and DNA vaccines, require a minimum of 10 years of careful testing and extensive follow-up. These new so-called vaccines were “tested” for only 2 months and then the results of these safety test were and continue to be kept secret. Testimony before Senator Ron Johnson by several who participated in the 2 months study indicates that virtually no follow-up of the participants of the pre-release study was ever done.[] Complains of complications were ignored and despite promises by Pfizer that all medical expenses caused by the “vaccines” would be paid by Pfizer, these individuals stated that none were paid.[] Some medical expenses exceed 100,000 dollars.

As an example of the deception by Pfizer, and the other makers of mRNA vaccines, is the case of 12-year-old Maddie de Garay, who participated in the Pfizer vaccine pre-release safety study. At Sen. Johnson’s presentation with the families of the vaccine injured, her mother told of her child’s recurrent seizures, that she is now confined to a wheelchair, must be tube fed and suffers permanent brain damage. On the Pfizer safety evaluation submitted to the FDA her only side effect is listed as having a “stomachache”. Each person submitted similar horrifying stories.

The Japanese resorted to a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) lawsuit to force Pfizer to release its secret biodistribution study. The reason Pfizer wanted it kept secret is that it demonstrated that Pfizer lied to the public and the regulatory agencies about the fate of the injected vaccine contents (the mRNA enclosed nano-lipid carrier). They claimed that it remained at the site of the injection (the shoulder), when in fact their own study found that it rapidly spread throughout the entire body by the bloodstream within 48 hours.

The study also found that these deadly nano-lipid carriers collected in very high concentrations in several organs, including the reproductive organs of males and females, the heart, the liver, the bone marrow, and the spleen (a major immune organ). The highest concentration was in the ovaries and the bone marrow. These nano-lipid carriers also were deposited in the brain.

Dr. Ryan Cole, a pathologist from Idaho reported a dramatic spike in highly aggressive cancers among vaccinated individuals, (not reported in the Media). He found a frighteningly high incidence of highly aggressive cancers in vaccinated individuals, especially highly invasive melanomas in young people and uterine cancers in women.[] Other reports of activation of previously controlled cancers are also appearing among vaccinated cancer patients.[] Thus far, no studies have been done to confirm these reports, but it is unlikely such studies will be done, at least studies funded by grants from the NIH.

The high concentration of spike proteins found in the ovaries in the biodistribution study could very well impair fertility in young women, alter menstruation, and could put them at an increased risk of ovarian cancer. The high concentration in the bone marrow, could also put the vaccinated at a high risk of leukemia and lymphoma. The leukemia risk is very worrisome now that they have started vaccinating children as young as 5 years of age. No long-term studies have been conducted by any of these makers of Covid-19 vaccines, especially as regards the risk of cancer induction. Chronic inflammation is intimately linked to cancer induction, growth and invasion and vaccines stimulate inflammation.

Cancer patients are being told they should get vaccinated with these deadly vaccines. This, in my opinion, is insane. Newer studies have shown that this type of vaccine inserts the spike protein within the nucleus of the immune cells (and most likely many cell types) and once there, inhibits two very important DNA repair enzymes, BRCA1 and 53BP1, whose duty it is to repair damage to the cell’s DNA.[] Unrepaired DNA damage plays a major role in cancer.

There is a hereditary disease called xeroderma pigmentosum in which the DNA repair enzymes are defective. These ill-fated individuals develop multiple skin cancers and a very high incidence of organ cancer as a result. Here we have a vaccine that does the same thing, but to a less extensive degree.

One of the defective repair enzymes caused by these vaccines is called BRCA1, which is associated with a significantly higher incidence of breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in men.

It should be noted that no studies were ever done on several critical aspects of this type of vaccine.

  • They have never been tested for long term effects
  • They have never been tested for induction of autoimmunity
  • They have never been properly tested for safety during any stage of pregnancy
  • No follow-up studies have been done on the babies of vaccinated women
  • There are no long-term studies on the children of vaccinated pregnant women after their birth (Especially as neurodevelopmental milestone occur).

  • It has never been tested for effects on a long list of medical conditions:

    • Diabetes
    • Heart disease
    • Atherosclerosis
    • Neurodegenerative diseases
    • Neuropsychiatric effects
    • Induction of autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia
    • Long term immune function
    • Vertical transmission of defects and disorders
    • Cancer
    • Autoimmune disorders

Previous experience with the flu vaccines clearly demonstrates that the safety studies done by researchers and clinical doctors with ties to pharmaceutical companies were essentially all either poorly done or purposefully designed to falsely show safety and coverup side effects and complications. This was dramatically demonstrated with the previously mentioned phony studies designed to indicate that hydroxy Chloroquine and Ivermectin were ineffective and too dangerous to use.[,,] These fake studies resulted in millions of deaths and severe health disasters worldwide. As stated, 80% of all deaths were unnecessary and could have been prevented with inexpensive, safe repurposed medications with a very long safety history among millions who have taken them for decades or even a lifetime.[,]

It is beyond ironic that those claiming that they are responsible for protecting our health approved a poorly tested set of vaccines that has resulted in more deaths in less than a year of use than all the other vaccines combined given over the past 30 years. Their excuse when confronted was—“we had to overlook some safety measures because this was a deadly pandemic”.[,]

In 1986 President Reagan signed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which gave blanket protection to pharmaceutical makers of vaccines against injury litigation by families of vaccine injured individuals. The Supreme Court, in a 57-page opinion, ruled in favor of the vaccine companies, effectively allowing vaccine makers to manufacture and distribute dangerous, often ineffective vaccines to the population without fear of legal consequences. The court did insist on a vaccine injury compensation system which has paid out only a very small number of rewards to a large number of severely injured individuals. It is known that it is very difficult to receive these awards. According to the Health Resources and Services Administration, since 1988 the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has agreed to pay 3,597 awards among 19,098 vaccine injured individuals applying amounting to a total sum of $3.8 billion. This was prior to the introduction of the Covid-19 vaccines, in which the deaths alone exceed all deaths related to all the vaccines combined over a thirty-year period.

In 2018 President Trump signed into law the “right-to-try” law which allowed the use of experimental drugs and all unconventional treatments to be used in cases of extreme medical conditions. As we have seen with the refusal of many hospitals and even blanket refusal by states to allow Ivermectin, hydroxy-chloroquine or any other unapproved “official” methods to treat even terminal Covid-19 cases, these nefarious individuals have ignored this law.

Strangely, they did not use this same logic or the law when it came to Ivermectin and Hydroxy Chloroquine, both of which had undergone extensive safety testing by over 30 clinical studies of a high quality and given glowing reports on both efficacy and safety in numerous countries. In addition, we had a record of use for up to 60 years by millions of people, using these drugs worldwide, with an excellent safety record. It was obvious that a group of very powerful people in conjunction with pharmaceutical conglomerates didn’t want the pandemic to end and wanted vaccines as the only treatment option. Kennedy’s book makes this case using extensive evidence and citations.[,]

Dr. James Thorpe, an expert in maternal-fetal medicine, demonstrates that these covoid-19 vaccines given during pregnancy have resulted in a 50-fold higher incidence of miscarriage than reported with all other vaccines combined.[] When we examine his graph on fetal malformations there was a 144-fold higher incidence of fetal malformation with the Covid-19 vaccines given during pregnancy as compared to all other vaccines combined. Yet, the American Academy of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology endorse the safety of these vaccines for all stages of pregnancy and among women breast feeding their babies.

It is noteworthy that these medical specialty groups have received significant funding from Pfizer pharmaceutical company. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, just in the 4th quarter of 2010, received a total of $11,000 from Pfizer Pharmaceutical company alone.[] Funding from NIH grants are much higher.[] The best way to lose these grants is to criticize the source of the funds, their products or pet programs. Peter Duesberg, because of his daring to question Fauci’s pet theory of AIDS caused by HIV virus, was no longer awarded any of the 30 grant applications he submitted after going public. Prior to this episode, as the leading authority on retroviruses in the world, he had never been turned down for an NIH grant.[] This is how the “corrupted” system works, even though much of the grant money comes from our taxes.

HOT LOTS—DEADLY BATCHES OF THE VACCINES

A new study has now surfaced, the results of which are terrifying.[] A researcher at Kingston University in London, has completed an extensive analysis of the VAERs data (a subdepartment of the CDC which collects voluntary vaccine complication data), in which he grouped reported deaths following the vaccines according to the manufacturer’s lot numbers of the vaccines. Vaccines are manufactured in large batches called lots. What he discovered was that the vaccines are divided into over 20,000 lots and that one out of every 200 of these batches (lots) is demonstrably deadly to anyone who receives a vaccine from that lot, which includes thousands of vaccine doses.

He examined all manufactured vaccines—Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson (Janssen), etc. He found that among every 200 batches of the vaccine from Pfizer and other makers, one batch of the 200 was found to be over 50x more deadly than vaccines batches from other lots. The other vaccine lots (batches) were also causing deaths and disabilities, but nowhere near to this extent. These deadly batches should have appeared randomly among all “vaccines” if it was an unintentional event. However, he found that 5% of the vaccines were responsible for 90% of the serious adverse events, including deaths. The incidence of deaths and serious complications among these “hot lots” varied from over 1000% to several thousand percent higher than comparable safer lots. If you think this was by accident—think again. This is not the first time “hot lots” were, in my opinion, purposefully manufactured and sent across the nation—usually vaccines designed for children. In one such scandal, “hot lots” of a vaccine ended up all in one state and the damage immediately became evident. What was the manufacture’s response? It wasn’t to remove the deadly batches of the vaccine. He ordered his company to scatter the hot lots across the nation so that authorities would not see the obvious deadly effect.

All lots of a vaccine are numbered—for example Modera labels them with such codes as 013M20A. It was noted that the batch numbers ended in either 20A or 21A. Batches ending in 20A were much more toxic than the ones ending in 21A. The batches ending in 20A had about 1700 adverse events, versus a few hundred to twenty or thirty events for the 21A batches. This example explains why some people had few or no adverse events after taking the vaccine while others are either killed or severely and permanently harmed. To see the researcher’s explanation, go to https://www.bitchute.com/video/6xIYPZBkydsu/ In my opinion these examples strongly suggest an intentional alteration of the production of the “vaccine” to include deadly batches.

I have met and worked with a number of people concerned with vaccine safety and I can tell you they are not the evil anti-vaxxers you are told they are. They are highly principled, moral, compassionate people, many of which are top researchers and people who have studied the issue extensively. Robert Kennedy, Jr, Barbara Lou Fisher, Dr. Meryl Nass, Professor Christopher Shaw, Megan Redshaw, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dr. Joseph Mercola, Neil Z. Miller, Dr. Lucija Tomjinovic, Dr. Stephanie Seneff, Dr. Steve Kirsch and Dr. Peter McCullough just to name a few. These people have nothing to gain and a lot to lose. They are attacked viciously by the media, government agencies, and elite billionaires who think they should control the world and everyone in it.

WHY DID FAUCI WANT NO AUTOPSIES OF THOSE WHO DIED AFTER VACCINATION?

There are many things about this “pandemic” that are unprecedented in medical history. One of the most startling is that at the height of the pandemic so few autopsies, especially total autopsies, were being done. A mysterious virus was rapidly spreading around the world, a selected group of people with weakened immune systems were getting seriously ill and many were dying and the one way we could rapidly gain the most knowledge about this virus—an autopsy, was being discouraged.

Guerriero noted that by the end of April, 2020 approximately 150,000 people had died, yet there were only 16 autopsies performed and reported in the medical literature.[] Among these, only seven were complete autopsies, the remaining 9 being partial or by needle biopsy or incisional biopsy. Only after 170,000 deaths by Covid-19 and four months into the pandemic were the first series of autopsies actually done, that is, more than ten. And only after 280,000 deaths and another month, were the first large series of autopsies performed, some 80 in number.[] Sperhake, in a call for autopsies to be done without question, noted that the first full autopsy reported in the literature along with photomicrographs appeared in a medico-legal journal from China in February 2020.[,] Sperhake expressed confusion as to why there was a reluctance to perform autopsies during the crisis, but he knew it was not coming from the pathologists. The medical literature was littered with appeals by pathologist for more autopsies to be performed.[] Sperhake further noted that the Robert Koch Institute (The German health monitoring system) at least initially advised against doing autopsies. He also knew that at the time 200 participating autopsy institutions in the United States had done at least 225 autopsies among 14 states.

Some have claimed that this dearth of autopsies was based on the government’s fear of infection among the pathologists, but a study of 225 autopsies on Covid-19 cases demonstrated only one case of infection among the pathologist and this was concluded to have been an infection contracted elsewhere.[] Guerriero ends his article calling for more autopsies with this observation: “Shoulder to shoulder, clinical and forensic pathologists overcame the obstructions of autopsy studies in Covid-19 victims and hereby generated valuable knowledge on the pathophysiology of the interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 and the human body, thus contributing to our understanding of the disease.”[]

Suspicion concerning the worldwide reluctance of nations to allow full post mortem studies of Covid-19 victims may be based on the idea that it was more than by chance. There are at least two possibilities that stand out. First, those leading the progression of this “non-pandemic” event into a perceived worldwide “deadly pandemic”, were hiding an important secret that autopsies could document. Namely, just how many of the deaths were actually caused by the virus? To implement draconian measures, such as mandated mask wearing, lockdowns, destruction of businesses, and eventually mandated forced vaccination, they needed very large numbers of covid-19 infected dead. Fear would be the driving force for all these destructive pandemic control programs.

Elder et al in his study classified the autopsy findings into four groups.[]

  1. Certain Covid-19 death
  2. Probably Covid-19 death
  3. Possible Covid-19 death
  4. Not associated with Covid-19, despite the positive test.

What possibly concerned or even terrified the engineers of this pandemic was that autopsies just might, and did, show that a number of these so-called Covid-19 deaths in truth died of their comorbid diseases. In the vast majority of autopsy studies reported, pathologists noted multiple comorbid conditions, most of which at the extremes of life could alone be fatal. Previously it was known that common cold viruses had an 8% mortality in nursing homes.

In addition, valuable evidence could be obtained from the autopsies that would improve clinical treatments and could possibly demonstrate the deadly effect of the CDC mandated protocols all hospitals were required to follow, such as the use of respirators and the deadly, kidney-destroying drug remdesivir. The autopsies also demonstrated accumulating medical errors and poor-quality care, as the shielding of doctors in intensive care units from the eyes of family members inevitably leads to poorer quality care as reported by several nurses working in these areas.[–]

As bad as all this was, the very same thing is being done in the case of Covid vaccine deaths—very few complete autopsies have been done to understand why these people died, that is, until recently. Two highly qualified researchers, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi a microbiologist and highly qualified expert in infectious disease and Dr. Arne Burkhardt, a pathologist who is a widely published authority having been a professor of pathology at several prestigious institutions, recently performed autopsies on 15 people having died after vaccination. What they found explains why so many are dying and experiencing organ damage and deadly blood clots.[]

They determined that 14 of the fifteen people died as a result of the vaccines and not of other causes. Dr. Burkhardt, the pathologist, observed widespread evidence of an immune attack on the autopsied individuals’ organs and tissues— especially their heart. This evidence included extensive invasion of small blood vessels with massive numbers of lymphocytes, which cause extensive cell destruction when unleashed. Other organs, such as the lungs and liver, were observed to have extensive damage as well. These findings indicate the vaccines were causing the body to attack itself with deadly consequences. One can easily see why Anthony Fauci, as well as public health officers and all who are heavily promoting these vaccines, publicly discouraged autopsies on the vaccinated who subsequently died. One can also see that in the case of vaccines, that were essentially untested prior to being approved for the general public, at least the regulatory agencies should have been required to carefully monitor and analyze all serious complications, and certainly deaths, linked to these vaccines. The best way to do that is with complete autopsies.

While we learned important information from these autopsies what is really needed are special studies of the tissues of those who have died after vaccination for the presence of spike protein infiltration throughout the organs and tissues. This would be critical information, as such infiltration would result in severe damage to all tissues and organs involved—especially the heart, the brain, and the immune system. Animal studies have demonstrated this. In these vaccinated individuals the source of these spike proteins would be the injected nanolipid carriers of the spike protein producing mRNA. It is obvious that the government health authorities and pharmaceutical manufacturers of these “vaccines” do not want these critical studies done as the public would be outraged and demand an end to the vaccination program and prosecution of the involved individuals who covered this up.

CONCLUSIONS

We are all living through one of the most drastic changes in our culture, economic system, as well as political system in our nation’s history as well as the rest of the world. We have been told that we will never return to “normal” and that a great reset has been designed to create a “new world order”. This has all been outlined by Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, in his book on the “Great Reset”.[] This book gives a great deal of insight as to the thinking of the utopians who are proud to claim this pandemic “crisis” as their way to usher in a new world. This new world order has been on the drawing boards of the elite manipulators for over a century.[,] In this paper I have concentrated on the devastating effects this has had on the medical care system in the United States, but also includes much of the Western world. In past papers I have discussed the slow erosion of traditional medical care in the United States and how this system has become increasingly bureaucratized and regimented.[,] This process was rapidly accelerating, but the appearance of this, in my opinion, manufactured “pandemic” has transformed our health care system over night.

As you have seen, an unprecedented series of events have taken place within this system. Hospital administrators, for example, assumed the position of medical dictators, ordering doctors to follow protocols derived not from those having extensive experience in treating this virus, but rather from a medical bureaucracy that has never treated a single COVID-19 patient. The mandated use of respirators on ICU Covid-19 patients, for example, was imposed in all medical systems and dissenting physicians were rapidly removed from their positions as caregivers, despite their demonstration of markedly improved treatment methods. Further, doctors were told to use the drug remdesivir despite its proven toxicity, lack of effectiveness and high complication rate. They were told to use drugs that impaired respiration and mask every patient, despite the patient’s impaired breathing. In each case, those who refused to abuse their patients were removed from the hospital and even faced a loss of license—or worse.

For the first time in modern medical history, early medical treatment of these infected patients was ignored nationwide. Studies have shown that early medical treatment was saving 80% of higher number of these infected people when initiated by independent doctors.[,] Early treatment could have saved over 640,000 lives over the course of this “pandemic”. Despite the demonstration of the power of these early treatments, the forces controlling medical care continued this destructive policy.

Families were not allowed to see their loved ones, forcing these very sick individuals in the hospitals to face their deaths alone. To add insult to injury, funerals were limited to a few grieving family members, who were not allowed to even sit together. All the while large stores, such as Walmart and Cosco were allowed to operate with minimal restrictions. Nursing home patients were also not allowed to have family visitations, again being forced to die a lonely death. All the while, in a number of states, the most transparent being in New York state, infected elderly were purposefully transferred from hospitals into nursing homes, resulting in very high death rates of these nursing home residents. At the beginning of this “pandemic” over 50% of all death were occurring in nursing homes.

Throughout this “pandemic” we have been fed an unending series of lies, distortions and disinformation by the media, the public health officials, medical bureaucracies (CDC, FDA and WHO) and medical associations. Physicians, scientists, and experts in infectious treatments who formed associations designed to develop more effective and safer treatments, were regularly demonized, harassed, shamed, humiliated, and experience a loss of licensure, loss of hospital privileges and, in at least one case, ordered to have a psychiatric examination.[,,]

Anthony Fauci was given essentially absolute control of all forms of medical care during this event, including insisting that drugs he profited from be used by all treating physicians. He ordered the use of masks, despite at first laughing at the use of masks to filter a virus. Governors, mayors, and many businesses followed his orders without question.

The draconian measures being used, masking, lockdowns, testing of the uninfected, use of the inaccurate PCR test, social distancing, and contact tracing had been shown previously to be of little or no use during previous pandemics, yet all attempts to reject these methods were to no avail. Some states ignored these draconian orders and had either the same or fewer cases, as well as deaths, as the states with the most strictly enforced measures. Again, no amount of evidence or obvious demonstration along these lines had any effect on ending these socially destructive measures. Even when entire countries, such as Sweden, which avoided all these measures, demonstrated equal rates of infections and hospitalization as nations with the strictest, very draconian measures, no policy change by the controlling institutions occurred. No amount of evidence changed anything.

Experts in the psychology of destructive events, such as economic collapses, major disasters and previous pandemics demonstrated that draconian measures come with an enormous cost in the form of “deaths of despair” and in a dramatic increase in serious psychological disorders. The effects of these pandemic measures on children’s neurodevelopment is catastrophic and to a large extent irreversible.

Over time tens of thousands could die as a result of this damage. Even when these predictions began to appear, the controllers of this “pandemic” continued full steam ahead. Drastic increases in suicides, a rise in obesity, a rise in drug and alcohol use, a worsening of many health measures and a terrifying rise in psychiatric disorders, especially depression and anxiety, were ignored by the officials controlling this event.

We eventually learned that many of the deaths were a result of medical neglect. Individuals with chronic medical conditions, diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and neurological diseases were no longer being followed properly in their clinics and doctor’s offices. Non-emergency surgeries were put on hold. Many of these patients chose to die at home rather than risk going to the hospitals and many considered hospitals “death houses”.

Records of deaths have shown that there was a rise in deaths among those aged 75 and older, mostly explained by Covid-19 infections, but for those between the ages of 65 to 74, deaths had been increasing well before the pandemic onset.[] Between ages of 18 and aged 65 years, records demonstrate a shocking hike in non-Covid-19 deaths. Some of these deaths were explained by a dramatic increase in drug-related deaths, some 20,000 more than 2019. Alcohol related deaths also increased substantially, and homicides increased almost 30% in the 18 to 65-year group.

The head of the insurance company OneAmerica stated that their data indicated that the death rate for individuals aged 18 to 64 had increased 40% over the pre-pandemic period.[] Scott Davidson, the company’s CEO, stated that this represented the highest death rate in the history of insurance records, which does extensive data collections on death rates each year. Davidson also noted that this high of a death rate increase has never been seen in the history of death data collection. Previous catastrophes of monumental extent increased death rates no more than 10 percent, 40% is unprecedented.

Dr. Lindsay Weaver, Indiana’s chief medical officer, stated that hospitalizations in Indiana are higher than at any point in the past five years. This is of critical importance since the vaccines were supposed to significantly reduce deaths, but the opposite has happened. Hospitals are being flooded with vaccine complications and people in critical condition from medical neglect caused by the lockdowns and other pandemic measures.[,]

A dramatic number of these people are now dying, with the spike occurring after the vaccines were introduced. The lies flowing from those who have appointed themselves as medical dictators are endless. First, we were told that the lockdown would last only two weeks, they lasted over a year. Then we were told that masks were ineffective and did not need to be worn. Quickly that was reversed. Then we were told the cloth mask was very effective, now it’s not and everyone should be wearing an N95 mask and before that that they should double mask. We were told there was a severe shortage of respirators, then we discover they are sitting unused in warehouses and in city dumps, still in their packing crates. We were informed that the hospitals were filled mostly with the unvaccinated and later found the exact opposite was true the world over. We were told that the vaccine was 95% effective, only to learn that in fact the vaccines cause a progressive erosion of innate immunity.

Upon release of the vaccines, women were told the vaccines were safe during all states of pregnancy, only to find out no studies had been done on safety during pregnancy during the “safety tests” prior to release of the vaccine. We were told that careful testing on volunteers before the EUA approval for public use demonstrated extreme safety of the vaccines, only to learn that these unfortunate subjects were not followed, medical complications caused by the vaccines were not paid for and the media covered this all up.[] We also learned that the pharmaceutical makers of the vaccines were told by the FDA that further animal testing was unnecessary (the general public would be the Guinea pigs.) Incredibly, we were told that the Pfizer’s new mRNA vaccines had been approved by the FDA, which was a cleaver deception, in that another vaccine had approval (comirnaty) and not the one being used, the BioNTech vaccine. The approved comirnaty vaccine was not available in the United States. The national media told the public that the Pfizer vaccine had been approved and was no longer classed as experimental, a blatant lie. These deadly lies continue. It is time to stop this insanity and bring these people to justice.

Copyright : © 2022 Surgical Neurology International
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.